Windows Operating systems

Discussion in 'Computer Science & Culture' started by frogjake10, Nov 27, 2010.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. frogjake10 Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    19
    I've come across a very challenging question, Which OS for windows is better? Windows Xp, Windows Vista, Or Windows 7?
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. James R Just this guy, you know? Staff Member

    Messages:
    39,426
    Better for what?
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. frogjake10 Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    19
    Better for general computer use. Including User friendliness, How easy it is to create add-ons, speed, ability to run without crashing, Amount of bugs, adaptability.
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. James R Just this guy, you know? Staff Member

    Messages:
    39,426
    I've used XP and Windows 7. Many reports say that it wasn't worth upgrading from XP to Vista, but that Windows 7 is better.

    My own experience with Windows 7 so far is that it is an easier to use operating system than XP. I don't know about how easy it is to create add-ons, or even what you mean by that. Surely all software is an add-on to an operating system?

    Speed-wise, probably Windows 7 is more processor-intensive than XP, especially with the Aero activated. But if you have an up-to-date PC you probably won't notice a big difference.

    Windows 7 seems to recover from crashes better than XP, in my experience, but it's still probably not as stable as something like Linux.

    I haven't noticed any major bugs myself. However, any operating system with millions of lines of code is going to contain bugs, and I know that some have been found in Windows 7. There are also some annoyances - features you think should be there but aren't. But that's a feature that applies equally to XP, Vista and 7.

    You'll need to be specific about adaptability? What do you want the OS to adapt to, exactly? Or are you asking about how easy it will be for you to adapt to it? Or what?

    Bottom line: for general computer use, XP, Vista and Windows 7 all work pretty well as operating systems.
     
  8. frogjake10 Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    19
    By add-ons I meant, pretty much any software, and I meant more of, how easy it is to apply add-ons.
    I've always been a fan of Linux, but I haven't used it much, I had it for a short time on my PS3

    Basically, how easy you can change the settings on the computer to fit your way of use, like for a gamer, to hook up a controller, or for a school, to hook up several to one printer
     
  9. Repo Man Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,955
    Not necessarily included in the parameters you've stated, but; Windows 7 is the future. IMO, it has everything I liked about XP, and a number of significant improvements. If you want to run a large amount of memory, you must have a 64 bit OS. XP64 was never widely supported, and isn't really a viable option. Windows 7 includes Windows Media Center, which I like. Hardware support for XP is going to be gradually waning in the next few years.
     
  10. christa Frankly, I don't give a dam! Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,905
    Though I didn't like it when I first got it.. I like my windows 7..
     
  11. Blindman Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,425
    Love Win7. Could never go back to XP. Mind you im not a fan of Window Media Center and my copy of Photoshop CS2 has a few visual problems but nothing dysfunctional.
     
  12. darksidZz Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,924
    Windows 7 is better than XP, only because XP is mostly outdated, I mean essentially it is dying. Vista would be meaningless as an upgrade with Windows 7 out now. Also Windows 8 comes out soon why not just wait till then =/ lol

    Or you can try an Apple iMac not a bad system for an all-in-one. I would prefer that now since its just easier, however I do also like ASUS's eeebox and other all-in-one imitators.

    However I'd have to say the best OS with most flexibility so far seems to be Ubuntu, WINE can run many old XP programs and Ubuntu is looking good for future designs, well if you ignore Gnome Shell. Hell I couldn't do almost all the things I am using on Ubuntu with an Apple iMac, it just wouldn't work in Leopard. So ahh I'm babbling it's early I couldn't sleep.
     
  13. cosmictraveler Be kind to yourself always. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    33,264
    Since I have both I'd suggest that by staying with Windows XP you'll be very happy because there's not that much difference from XP to Windows 7. I also want to say that if you do get Windows 7 you will lose some drivers that won't work any longer like for your printer so be aware of that as well. Some games won't work as well because they don't make drivers for Windows 7. So looking at both of them XP is for me.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!



    Good luck on your choice, will you tell us which one you decide upon?
     
  14. James R Just this guy, you know? Staff Member

    Messages:
    39,426
    Windows 7 is certainly short of drivers for some older hardware, particularly for 64 bit - which is annoying. But that's largely the hardware manufacturers' fault, not Microsoft's.
     
  15. fedr808 1100101 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,706
    I have 7, and I enjoy it. But there is a little hole where XP once was.
     
  16. frogjake10 Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    19
    @Cosmic
    I definitely prefer windows XP as I have used it for so long. This was only to solve an argument between me and my friend over which is better as he has a windows 7 computer, and I have a XP.
     
  17. Stoniphi obscurely fossiliferous Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,256
    I have XP, XP64, WIN 7 and Ubuntu.

    A lot of my stuff won't float on WIN 7, but I like the speed and it works well with things like CS5 and Bryce etc.

    XP is fine, having that on a machine allows me to continue to use Quickbooks 2006 and a batch of other software that WIN 7 has left behind.

    XP 64 is also fine - and it is 64 bit. I had to go to Avast since neither Norton or McAfee service XP64.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

    I have a bunch of stuff that runs well on XP64 but won't float on WIN 7.

    As for Ubuntu....I have had it running nicely 3 times now, and 3 times it has 'updated' itself into oblivion. It will not recover despite repeated uses of recovery mode. It runs well until it installs updates. At this point, after years of wanting to believe in Linux and repeatedly trying Ubuntu, I am going to give up on this "free open source Operating System", concluding that it is well worth what I paid for it.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!



    Stick with XP until you can't stand it any more.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  18. cosmictraveler Be kind to yourself always. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    33,264
    He will need new drivers if he has old stuff that Win 7 doesn't have updates for. There's nothing wrong with Win 7 if you are starting out with a fresh system and not updating what you already own.
     
  19. Stoniphi obscurely fossiliferous Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,256
    Yeah, all of the new stuff runs nicely on this brand new setup.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  20. Bruce Lee Registered Member

    Messages:
    4
    I used windows XP before ......... but now i am using windows 7.
    Its much much better then windows XP in every matter .
     
  21. Pinwheel Banned Banned

    Messages:
    2,424
    I liked win7 but went back to winxp.
     
  22. queengeek Registered Member

    Messages:
    31
    Been doing good with 7. Only some small glitches but nothing like previous versions.
     
  23. Stryder Keeper of "good" ideas. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    13,105
    To be honest I haven't played with Ubuntu much myself, however if it is anything like how freebsd builds, if you do a "Major" version update, you need to make sure that you do the update in the right order. You see their are the programs that need to be brought up to that version that won't run on older kernels and updating the kernel means you can't run the old programs. So during the update process it's very easy to dis-attach the Kernel and "World" due to version differences.

    (Incidentally the reason the failures occur is because it's important to make sure the whole build has the same version, it's actually a Security protocol to stop depreciated versions of program or kernel from running that could have Security flaws and/or exploits.)

    I'm guessing your Ubuntu update was perhaps done without the full knowledge of how to do it. (That's where you usually have to roll back to a "Backup" that's made prior to attempting to update for "recovery")

    Obviously Linux and Unix clones are great when they are up and running, but are a nightmare if you need to rebuild/upgrade unless you are prepared to put the time and effort in.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page