Oh ok then that makes it fine!!!! one shit head having an agreement with another shit head!!! actually who is the top guy in mongolia???
Well no, I suspect that Tsakhiagiin Elbegdorj would require more than just lil Kim's say so and of course you are presuming that Elbegdorj is a shit head. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tsakhiagiin_Elbegdorj
No I think you have to make a couple of You Tube videos first. Actually, since they don't have uniforms they put themselves and the people they associate with at greater risk since it precludes their getting better treatment based on things like the Geneva Convention. But not wearing a uniform, as our spies didn't in WW2, gains you some tactical advantage even though being caught behind enemy lines without a uniform would also get you shot.
Ok mongolia was a bad example ok Kim jung ill decides to take out a korean fugitive in say zimbabwe (with mugabe's permission) using a long range drone with hellfire missles!!! Would that be acceptable????!!!?? one shit head talk to another shit head!!! and they say ok then!!!
Well the question is would it be acceptable to the Zimbabweans and I presume if Morgan Tsvangirai and Mugabe both looked at what Kim had to say about the need to take this guy out and they both agreed to it, then yeah it would be acceptable for Kim to do so.
so how do you become an alqueda member?? could i become one?? (not saying i want to obviously actually nothing i could think of worse but hey!!) Also can i leave alqueda???
not sure ho much say Tsvangira has but anyway ok fine then lets just assisinate any1 anywhere in the world!!! Lets hope i am not an iranian who is on the run from the iranian nutjob clerics and hiding in syria as them Iranian drones may just take me out on the streets of Alleppo or in the middle of the syrian dessert!!!! yeah no probs as long as the ayotollah and assad say its ok!!!
Again there's that uniform thing. One of the reasons you get the protections of the Geneva Convention is you operate under a set of rules. That includes wearing a uniform. Al Qaeda doesn't, so leaving it is a bit difficult. On the other hand, we tend to only target the people who are very active (here's a hint, so far they have all had their own Wiki entries), so essentially if you go back to a normal life and no longer hang out with other terrorists you can probably quit looking up all the time.
You do know that operating those Drones and those Hellfire missles are REALLY expensive don't you? So the fact is, you REALLY have to piss someone off to get them to spend that much time and money just to take you out. Arthur
the americans doing the killing in this case are represnting the country, in the civil war there wasn't a country to represnt per se, the fight was actually to decide the country, it's different. in the first case america is defined and sovereign, and it has decided to kill you with no right, you, its citizen. in your case it was an internal fight to define america, to decide what america is, it's not the same. EXCELLENT! now, what good would that evidence be, now that he's dead? hey, i totally sympethize with terrorists, i'm not well known or a supporter [yet Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!], but should i be just killed at the first chance, and after i'm dead to show that i'm innocent they call me a terrorists to gain the american sheep's acceptence? is that how it works? think of how it can be abused, think of how it may have been an abuse already, did anwar really deserve death? if yes, who is there to decide? has he decided? is his decision complete without even the attendence of the person in question? i mean, :wtf: at this point that's purly what they're doing. today's terrorists? i don't think so. let them restore the islamic law in their own countries before spreading it to other countries, todays terrorists are scared cats driven to a corner with the only choice of a suicidal offensive, their brains are full of the simple animalistic instincts of staying alive and keeping their children and families alive and fed, they're veeeeeery far away from the state of being concerned about the ideological composition of the world and what's wrong and what's right. sometimes it appears to be so for many reasons, but it's far from it. "liberated" and "oppressors" are subjective, to you. i'm sure americans are oppressing countries with the islamic rule more than the islamic rule is oppressing them, in islamic rule we bring a guy to court and calling in the eye witnesses and researching their backgrounds before the beheading, we don't watch our little screens in our officess then blow a person in a country that isn't ours while drinming coffee. Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
You know, in the case of the Cole and the WTC Towers and Bali etc etc none of those people had eyewitnesses called or their backgrounds researched. They were simply exterminated. So no, the terrorists you are defending, who are still recruiting, advising and plotting to do the same actions again, don't deserve it either. Which is why we have made our 9/11 their 24/7. Arthur