Origin of Virus

Discussion in 'Biology & Genetics' started by arauca, Oct 4, 2011.

  1. arauca Banned Banned

    Messages:
    4,564
    What is the origin of virus .

    Is it created ?

    Is it a bi product of dead DNA or RNA ?

    If evolved, how did it evolve ?
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. cosmictraveler Be kind to yourself always. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    33,264
    The origins of viruses in the evolutionary history of life are unclear: some may have evolved from plasmids – pieces of DNA that can move between cells – while others may have evolved from bacteria. In evolution, viruses are an important means of horizontal gene transfer, which increases genetic diversity.

    WIKI
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. Hercules Rockefeller Beatings will continue until morale improves. Moderator

    Messages:
    2,828
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. Ellie Banned Banned

    Messages:
    424
    Are virus' related to bacteria?
     
  8. ElectricFetus Sanity going, going, gone Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    18,523
    No. Also viruses likely have many origins as they have a level of genetic diversity not seen in other true living creatures, many viruses have completely different genetic structures and the only feature they have in common is being genetic packets that lack any metabolism of their own, that reproducing by infecting host cells and manipulating the host cells to manufacture more viruses.
     
  9. river-wind Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,671
    For years I thought that RNA viruses may be an example of a second round of abiogenesis; a novel form of life made of nothing more than rudimentary genetic material and a protein coat. After learning more about DNA viruses, however, I'm less inclined to support the abiogensis method, and more towards the plasmid method: rouge bits of RNA or DNA that, instead of transferring to another bacteria as is normal, struck out on thier own.

    They have all the hallmarks of life at certain times, but not always. To complicate the question of if viruses are alive is the similar questions: are prions alive? They don't even have hereditary material or a coating of any kind. No homeostasis. But they reproduce. Where exactly does life diverge from non-life?
     
  10. DRZion Theoretical Experimentalist Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,046
    I wonder how soon an exception will be found - why shouldn't a virus generate just one protein and secrete it, for instance? Ribozymes may very well exist in viruses.

    Thats a good question. I used to think that viruses weren't life, but my coursework made me ponder this. Viruses are really important in many ecosystems, some of them can be quite complex, and they are all very dynamic from an evolutionary perspective. I don't know if that constitutes life. :shrug:
     
  11. Hercules Rockefeller Beatings will continue until morale improves. Moderator

    Messages:
    2,828
    An account of the world’s largest virus has just been published. Infectious reading!

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!



    The journal article:

    Distant Mimivirus relative with a larger genome highlights the fundamental features of Megaviridae
    http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2011/10/04/1110889108.abstract

    Some popular science coverage:

    Megavirus May Be Stripped-Down Version of Normal Cell
    http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2011/10/megavirus-cell-evolution/

    World's largest virus proves giants came from cells
    http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn21027-worlds-largest-virus-proves-giants-came-from-cells.html

    Please welcome Megavirus, the world’s most ginormous virus
    http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2011/10/10/please-welcome-megavirus-the-worlds-most-ginormous-virus/
     
  12. Walter L. Wagner Cosmic Truth Seeker Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,559
    This is probably premature speculation, but is it a possibility that all viruses are so derived, i.e. continued divesting of genes such that a megavirus becomes a diminutive virus? Or is this 'convergent' evolution, in which some early eukaryotes devolved into a 'mega' virus that happens to look a lot like much smaller viruses.

    If so, it's quite possible that the many kinds of viruses are derived from some of the earliest primitive prokaryotic cells, and not just from a presumptive eukaryotic cell such as the Megavirus of the article, creating viruses of both RNA and DNA replication.
     
  13. arauca Banned Banned

    Messages:
    4,564

    It is a dumb question but do viruses have telomers , if so then do they carry a telomerase , . As they break once ( Replicate ) then the next virus will not be the same ?
     
  14. DRZion Theoretical Experimentalist Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,046
    There is considerable evidence that as bacteria begin to colonize one another there is a high likelihood of genome reduction in the intracellular bacterium. The smallest bacteria are all obligate intracellular mutualists or parasites. Because they spend their entire lifecycle inside of other cells they gradually lose all the genes associated with - cell walls, synthesizing vital nutrients, protecting themselves from predators, navigating the environment, pretty much everything but the most basic requirements of reproduction of their genes.
    Next, all it has to do is figure out a way of traveling from host to host - which can happen for instance due to incorrect cell partitioning or secretion.. I think that viruses likely evolved even before this more advanced feature, but I have not read any papers on this subject.
     
  15. Hercules Rockefeller Beatings will continue until morale improves. Moderator

    Messages:
    2,828
    No. Telomeres serve to protect chromosomes from instability as a result of the gradual shortening of the DNA ends through the process of chromosomal duplication/cell division. None of that applies to viruses.

    Interestingly, retroviruses have telomere-like repeats at the ends of their DNA segments. These act as recombination points for viral integration into the telomeric regions of the host cell chromosomes.
     
  16. Michael 歌舞伎 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    20,285
    Wolbachia is a bacteria that can only live inside of another cells. Millions of species are infected with it. It's almost like a virus. Some species have completely integrated the entire Wolbachia genome and it is now a part of that species. Interestingly, some species are so dependent that they can't live without the infection.
     
  17. Walter L. Wagner Cosmic Truth Seeker Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,559
    Fascinating. I wonder how far back in time they go for infecting insects, etc. A whole new concept in gene transfer.
     
  18. ricardonest Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    95
    How viruses evolve--Pretty Interesting

    Here goes a video on how viruses evolve:
    How viruses evolve
     
  19. arauca Banned Banned

    Messages:
    4,564
    Thank you for the input.
     
  20. arauca Banned Banned

    Messages:
    4,564


    I have the impression RNA is not stable for long period, yet the retrovirus which is supposedly to be an RNA virus is stable , Is it because the encapsulation package or some other means ?
     
  21. Aqueous Id flat Earth skeptic Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,152
    There is a fairly recent hypothesis that eukayotes (having organelles) arose from prokaryotes that ingested other prokaryotes. The idea is that the ingested cells are stripped down and rebuilt into organelles. That process, if it actually happened, would also have had to contend with the ingested nucleus. If so, extra genes or fragments floating around in the "predator" nucleus also may have contributed for some specialized mutations to occur (pseudo-deterministic as opposed to random?). But, in addition, it seems like a lot of useless (and potentially harmful) DNA would have been left over. So it would seem logical that these cells would eventually stuff the leftovers in vacuoles and expel them. If so, those vacuoles would seem to have been a good breeding ground for primitive viruses, or at least for the raw material from which viruses were able to evolve in some other host or medium.
     
  22. wellwisher Banned Banned

    Messages:
    5,160
    When I look at a stereo-typical virus, I see a pre-life state. We have some genetic material and a protein coat. To me this appears to be a crude form of genetic material with packing protein similar to the shell of a bug. This external packing state reflects a different configurational equilibrium than normal packing protein, which help to wind up the DNA and end up inside DNA configurations.

    In terms of abiogenesis, once genetic material is made available, having proteins around could result in protein sticking to it, rendering the genetic material inert. We have plenty of negative charge on the phosphate to be ignored and coddled like in the lab. This could be a problem but will nevertheless help to preserve it until things change for the better.

    What will need to happen is a change within the environmental configurational equilibria. The modern virus, instead of waiting for that change to occur, is a go-getter. By entering a cell it places itself in a new aqueous equilibrium condition where configurational changes can occur allow use of the genetic material.

    The reason I see this as pre-life before cells is due to its simplicity.
     
  23. GASHOLE Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    64
    all things are related to each other, to be precise.
     

Share This Page