Have you investigated Gnostic Christianity?

Discussion in 'Religion' started by Greatest I am, Mar 19, 2014.

  1. roger_pearse Registered Member

    Messages:
    68
    In favour, of course, of whatever the establishment today would like us to think.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

    Which, sadly, is always the alternative held in mind. Hmm, yes. I think I can see a small problem with this.

    Erm, this is not the history of either Christianity or Gnosticism. Gnosticism was pretty much dead by Constantine's day. There were still Valentinians in the 4th century, and Marcionites in the 6th century; but the anti-heretical edicts are in the main directed at Manichaeans and Arians and the like.

    Glad to see you go to a source: well done. I don't think I had come across this Carpocratian text before, I have to say. Very interesting. (Thanks for the links)

    That said... what is the argument here? Is it not about *property*? That everything should be held communally, because everything is the same? **Specifically ... women as common property?** This does not, to my eye, read like an egalitarian manifesto from late 20th c. America (nor should we expect it to). The views you mentioned were, after all, the rallying cries of a late 20th century movement, not a second century one.

    (Is this transcription accurate, do you suppose? At points the English becomes rather contorted: e.g. "For he himself gave the desire to sustain the race orders that it is to be supposed" ... which should read "suppressed", surely?)

    All the best,

    Roger Pearse
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. roger_pearse Registered Member

    Messages:
    68
    I'm afraid this is a bit vague for me. Could you be more specific?

    All the best,

    Roger Pearse
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. Greatest I am Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,740
    It is a good thing that Gnostic Christians are not literalists. I trust no document that came from the Middle East from a time where there was no English, that has names like Mary and Thomas and Judas that handily means traitor. Just too damned convenient.

    What I am saying is that I do not trust translators that well.

    You will also know that my theology is still under construction as a lot of material never got past the Christian gospel burners.

    That is why I tend to try to discuss morals as those are what is important in religions. Although one would not think so after looking at Christian and Muslim discrimination and denigration of women and gays without just cause.

    Regards
    DL
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. Greatest I am Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,740
  8. roger_pearse Registered Member

    Messages:
    68
    Is this claim entirely compatible with producing an ancient text as evidence that gnostics held the (modern) views you advanced? Sounds a lot like having your cake and eating it...

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!



    All the best,

    Roger Pearse
     
  9. roger_pearse Registered Member

    Messages:
    68
  10. Greatest I am Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,740
    Then do your own leg work lazy.

    Regards
    DL
     
  11. Greatest I am Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,740
    I do not care if it is or not as long as it fits the general view that begins with recognition of the spark of God within all of us.

    Sure beats the Abrahamic religions that deny women and gays equality.

    Even if Gnostic Christian beliefs were all found to be bogus, the fact they pushed full equality for all makes it a cut above what is presently on offer. As k any woman or gay.

    Regards
    DL
     
  12. spidergoat pubic diorama Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    54,036
    I have no such spark. Who's this "God" fellow?
     
  13. roger_pearse Registered Member

    Messages:
    68
    Sorry mate, but I have no real interest in exchanging words with people too bloody lazy to bother whether what they say makes sense even in the most basic terms.
     
  14. roger_pearse Registered Member

    Messages:
    68
    Right back at you. Some of us, little man, do know what we are talking about, so don't bother with the bluster.
     
  15. Greatest I am Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,740
    Only you can say.

    Just as I can only say who mine is. It just happens that I can say that my God's name is I am, and mean me.

    Jesus asked --- Have ye forgotten that ye are Gods?

    If you have nothing to internalize in terms of a God myth, it is harder to activate your pineal gland and your third eye.

    If you do not have a spiritual itch or religious belief then your God would be whoever or whatever the ideal you know in laws or rules for life is. S philosophy or political leaning.

    Regards
    DL
     
  16. spidergoat pubic diorama Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    54,036
    I would prefer not the use the word god for that, since it's not the right term.
     
  17. Greatest I am Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,740
    I do not like it either and see that title as a miss-use of English.

    That is why I used "the ideal you know in laws or rules for life.", in your case, instead of the word God.

    Call those rules whatever you like but recognize that they are written in your heart and will trump most anything out here.

    Regards
    DL
     
  18. spidergoat pubic diorama Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    54,036
    It's the mark of the skeptic to be able to question one's values. I think "writing them in your heart" is misguided. There is no way to come up with a pre-determined answer to every problem, morally or otherwise. That's the whole problem with religion.
     
  19. Greatest I am Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,740
    I was not talking about religions and their 3,000 year old garbage laws.

    I am talking today and the laws you write on your heart regardless of the source of that wisdom.

    As to morals overall. They are close to identical in most people. This is a proven social science fact.

    I cannot imagine a scenario that you could not think your way out of as to the best moral path.

    Gnostic Christians like me used to have a saying. We have no faith is Sofia/Wisdom, but she has faith in us.

    Like God, she is here to serve us. Use her wisely.

    Regards
    DL
     
  20. spidergoat pubic diorama Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    54,036
    Things that sound deep but really aren't.
     
  21. Greatest I am Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,740
    Indicating that you are not fit to judge them.

    Regards
    DL
     
  22. roger_pearse Registered Member

    Messages:
    68
    Don't bother with this guy. I have encountered such people before. They use words to mean whatever is convenient at any given moment; at one point attacking people with a set of words, and the next denying that they meant anything of the kind or that words don't really mean anything. Such slipperiness makes talking to them a waste of time, as they are always beneath reason.

    They do not, of course, carry this habit into their tax returns

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!



    No honest person behaves in this manner. And why would one wish to talk to someone who can't even talk honestly?
     
  23. Kittamaru Ashes to ashes, dust to dust. Adieu, Sciforums. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    13,938
    Such insinuations would, of course, be an ad hominem attack (arguing the person instead of the subject)
     

Share This Page