The Einstein cross refers to a specific event due to gravitational lensing. http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap950711.html Why would I listen to your explanation of how lensing works, when I can just go here: http://www.einstein-online.info/spotlights/grav_lensing_history
It's ended up being just another "tired light" theory. Nothing original in it. Just a lot of violations of physical principles.
Put it in a crank folder and let it collect dust on the shelf for several years. You'll probably throw it away someday after you realize the mistakes in it.
www.cascadinguniverse.org. Please tell me how the evidence does not support it if you are going to call me a crank and claim it violates "a lot of physical principles."
It works generally as that says but it ALSO occurs due to the Great Attractor as I say (by the same mechanism just on a much larger scale). Dispute the evidence of Figure 5 in my paper?
On a smaller scale. Remember the Great Attractor is basically a super SUPER massive black hole that lenses ALL light we observe to a degree. It would not appear so simply, however if you look at Figure 5 you will see multiple Einstein crosses, as I describe. You are not arguing this fact whatsoever by referring to smaller scale lensing.
Gravitational lensing will not cause a photon to loop back toward the source, your figure eight pattern.
Not by a galaxy but by a galaxy of galaxies. Please explain why not; remember, all things are relative. Further, please see Figure 4 of my paper and the discussion thereof (section 3.2) www.cascadinguniverse.org for evidence of the flow I describe, along with the rest of the evidence that supports my claims. (sections 4.1 regarding the Figure-8 pattern and electromagnetism, and section 4.3 where I discuss quasars specifically which are very much evidence of what I am saying).
Yes. I in the main I always dismiss, God botherers, Alternative hypothesis pushers without real evidence, and anti establishment and conspiracy adherents I know how an Einstein Cross is produced by reading reputable science papers by reputable scientists. Sorry...You do not fit into that category. I don't worship science as much as I abhore God bothering fools, those with delusions of grandeur, and tall poppy syndrome anti mainstream nutters. You have not presented any evidence, despite how many times you claim that. All you have done is applied your own interpretation and anti mainstream take on different aspects of cosmology. You have not even come close to invalidating accepted mainstream models. That's why you ignore peer review.
WOWWWW I'm so done talking to you. Your OPINIONS are in no way a scientific rebuttal, and you champion ignorance like no other. G'luck accepting your fallacies when you have to face them.
You are the one championing ignorance...you are the one doing the claiming...You are the one doing the misinterpreting....again, all you do is offer an unlikley alternative....nothing to invalidate the incumbent model, nothing to support your own hypothesis. The onus of proof is on you, and you have nothing. That's why you failed peer review, if you ever submitted to peer review.
What you need to do is team up with the other three/four ToE theory claimants on this forum and present a United ToE to change the world and the rest of us Idiots. Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
Yeah, once the discussion stops being about the topic and becomes about the person, it is best to wait for responses that are on topic. No response to a post like that, not even one like this, can go unpunished. I am more motivated to look at your ideas and respond with questions when the incivility becomes inappropriate. The lensing idea is not without some foundation, and the view we have of the universe on the other side of the GA is bound to be affected by the interveening eneregy density shaping the light. How much lensing, what the things we "see" really look like from the un-lensed perspective, etc. are still questions in my mind, and open to speculation. Thanks for bringing us the topic. Too bad you are prone to hyperbole and visions of scientific accomplishment, because that attitude, coupled with the religious connection tend to fuel incivility, even in a Fringe forum. Later.
I've tried, I emailed a bunch once I started the website so I am waiting to see if anyone bothers to look into it. Unfortunately I am not a student so I don't have any help from a professor etc.