Explaining the dead center cube

25/8 * 14.4 = 360/115.2....and 25/8 in a Eulidean form does not use the same factor "14.4" do you deny this?

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

The theory you suggested that I am a passively aggressive member that is your theory, you made that assumption did you not? Who cares about my post and how I post am asking you if you want to test your hypothesis in real life I can have it arranged? Reality always has the last word isn't that right origin, isn't that right?

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

25/8 * 14.4 = 360/115.2....and 25/8 in a Eulidean form does not use the same factor "14.4" do you deny this?

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Since whatever "logic" you claim to have used is not apparent I wonder how "simplistic" it really is.

You mean that you're incapable of stating clearly what you mean?

One more time: what is 360/115.2?

Not even close.
25/8 * 14.4 = 45. (Assuming you meant (25/8) * 14.4. Otherwise it's 25/(8 * 14.4) and = 0.217013888)
360/115.2 = 3.125

W. T. F. are you on about?
What does "in a Euclidian form" mean?

 

Just a friendly reminder that personal insults are frowned upon heavily, and threatening the physical safety of another member will result in immediate, and severe, moderation.

 

As long as you keep saying things like, "He will produce a superior predictive calculation of "p1" with any perfect circle that can be constructed with a protractor..." we'll never be able to find even ground. There's no "predictive value" involved. "Perfect circle' is an unnecessary designation. And so on. You seem to be trying to rewrite the book on mathematics without having read the book in the first place.

As for your "challenge", as I have already said, it's been done and your hypothesis is wrong.

 

Many of your comments are passive-aggressive in my opinion, I would hardly call that a theory. I am not sure why you reacted so violently to that though.

The only reason for me to resort to physical violence would be to protect myself, my family or another person in need. I would not risk injury to myself or to another over a simple observation made on a forum, sorry.

Not sure what you mean by that. If you mean reality is real then I guess I agree.

 

Testing 3.125 vs. π with graph paper

For circle centered on a lattice point of graph paper of various radii
\( \begin{array}{c|ccc} \frac{r}{\textrm{side}} & \left\lfloor \frac{25}{8} \left( \frac{r}{\textrm{side}} \right)^2 \right\rfloor & \textrm{Squares Enclosed} & \left\lfloor \pi \left( \frac{r}{\textrm{side}} \right)^2 \right\rfloor \\ \hline \\ \sqrt{51250} & 160156 & 160160 & 161006 \\ \sqrt{51251} & 160159 & 160160 & 161009 \\ \sqrt{51272} & 160225 & 160232 & 161075 \\ \sqrt{51273} & 160228 & 160232 & 161078 \\ \sqrt{51274} & 160231 & 160232 & 161082 \\ \sqrt{51653} & 161415 & 161424 & 162272 \\ \sqrt{51654} & 161418 & 161424 & 162275 \\ \sqrt{51655} & 161421 & 161424 & 162278 \\ \sqrt{52567} & 164271 & 164272 & 165144 \\ \sqrt{53479} & 167121 & 167124 & 168009 \\ 245 & 187578 & 187580 & 188574 \\ \sqrt{60441} & 188878 & 188900 & 189881 \\ 247 & 190653 & 190680 & 191665 \\ 248 & 192200 & 192212 & 193220 \\ 250 & 195312 & 195320 & 196349 \\ 255 & 203203 & 203248 & 204282 \\ 256 & 204800 & 204836 & 205887 \\ 257 & 206403 & 206436 & 207499 \\ 258 & 208012 & 208016 & 209116 \\ 259 & 209628 & 209676 & 210741 \\ 260 & 211250 & 211316 & 212371 \\ 261 & 212878 & 212928 & 214008 \end{array} \)

Rather than the error-prone experimental method of measuring and dividing, this experimental method is completely reproducible and involves only counting for some circles of radius larger than 226 grid spaces any circle of radius of 255 grid spaces or more. Because of the symmetry of the lattice of grid points, it is efficient in that one may count the squares in just one quadrant and multiply by 4.

 

Hala;'kin has been banned and his posts purged - for creating a sockpuppet to evade a temporary ban, Jason.Marshall is now permanently banned.

Is there any reason to keep this thread open, given the self destruct of the OP?

 

There is no reason to keep this thread open, but I would like to know where the ban list is located, if you don't mind. I can't seem to find it anywhere. Thanks.

 

http://www.sciforums.com/banlist/

If you look at the very top of the forums, under the SciForums banner, you will see Home, Forums, Banned Users, Members, Encyclopedia

 

I concur in this evaluation and expression of gratitude.

 

Jay , just take a breath ,(its possible your over their heads )

Then explain

river

 

But what is your reasoning to close this thread

 

Because the OP has been permanently banned for evasion of moderator action.

 

Not so far , which is a good thing

 

Maybe he was a "sockpuppet".

 

More than likely not

 

My reasoning that it shouldn't have been allowed in the Math section is that it isn't math.

 

River - what, may I ask, is your basis for this?

Jason.Marshall was issued a temporary ban for threatening another member. He then made a sockpuppet account called Hala;'kin to evade the ban (using a proxy to hide the IP address), came here, and quite foolishly announced that it was a sockpuppet and his intentions by posting not only in threads he was previously active in, but by replying to the moderator action and expressing that he was not guilty of an infractionable offense.

The sockpuppet account was banned and all its posts removed using the "spam" function, and the original account has been issued a permanent ban, in accordance with the site rules:
http://www.sciforums.com/threads/sciforums-site-rules.142880/

Sock puppets
4. We have a ‘no sock puppets’ policy, which means one screen name per member. Members found to be using two or more names may be banned.

5. Banned members who register under a different name will have all identities permanently banned upon discovery. This may result in a temporary ban becoming permanent.