Astrological Sign

Discussion in 'The Cesspool' started by Orleander, Mar 3, 2009.

?

Do you believe in astrology?

Poll closed Apr 17, 2009.
  1. Yes

    27.0%
  2. No

    73.0%
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. theobserver is a simple guy... Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    338

    Exactly. How else do you consider finding objective proof for a subjective matter? Its same like telling you that when i hit my head on this wall, I feel x amt of pain. You can no way know how exactly how it feels unless u bang ur own head on the same wall at the same speed provided you are of my age and have similar physical conditions.

    Proof for any field of science takes pain and effort. When the subject under question is physically present and observable, its easier. Because its measurable. When the subject being investigated is non measurable substance, only an insane man would seek measurable proof.
     
  2. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. cluelusshusbund + Public Dilemma + Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,000
    You clame thers proof of Astrology that those wit the proper knowlwdge can understan... but obvously you'r proof dont include verifiable evidence or you coud preseent it in black an white on this bord.!!!

    What you seem to be suggestin is... that i wont be able to understan the "proof" of Astrology until i gane the necesary knowledge to share what you "feel" (beleive)... an then i will be able to understan the proof you cant discuss.!!!

    I say thats jibber-jabber... but in all fareness i will meet you half way... ie... i cant esplane the proof of my religion (NACA) in a way you will except as bein true until you study my religion an gane the knowledge necesary to except the proof of it... so my offer is this... you show you'r good will by properly studyin my beleifs an then i will serousliy study you'r beleifs about Astrology.!!!

    So do you plan to except my offer below... an if no... why not.???

    "i cant esplane the proof of my religion (NACA) in a way you will except as bein true until you study my religion an gane the knowledge necesary to except the proof of it... so my offer is this... you show you'r good will by properly studyin my beleifs an then i will serousliy study you'r beleifs about Astrology.!!!"
     
  4. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. cluelusshusbund + Public Dilemma + Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,000

    Hi Bells...
    I see that you quoted me... was it by accident that you'r post got that close to bein on topic.???
     
  6. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. theobserver is a simple guy... Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    338

    I thought u already know that many religious people also mention the same thing. Ever wondered why? and what they were talking about? And none of them are those religiously blind morons. If you dig up either one of it, you would reach the same place.

    Its about the difference between knowledge and rest of the stuff - facts, truth, information and so on. To know, one must experience and experiment. Else one only has information and then a layer of faith to convince them that the information they know is true. Without doing any experiment or experience if you still keep asking for proof, I will prove to you that you are hoping to be a believer than a knowledge seeker.
     
  8. cluelusshusbund + Public Dilemma + Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,000
    So do you plan to except my offer (below)... an if no... why not.???

    "i cant esplane the proof of my religion (NACA) in a way you will except as bein true until you study my religion an gane the knowledge necesary to except the proof of it... so my offer is this... you show you'r good will by properly studyin my beleifs an then i will serousliy study you'r beleifs about Astrology.!!!"


    Rite now im wonderin why you wont do what you espect me to do... which is... properlly study my beleifs so you can then understan the truth i have.!!!
     
  9. theobserver is a simple guy... Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    338
    I already have. Like i said, when u dig deeper into it, you will reach the same place. Since you haven't been there, it means only one thing - you haven't dig enough.
     
  10. cluelusshusbund + Public Dilemma + Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,000
    Yeah... we're on the sam page... the reason you dont share my beleifs is cause you havent tryed hard enuff to beleive the way i do.!!!

    What a shame... cause my beleifs are corect an you'rs ant... but un-like you... i have proof to bak it up.!!!
     
    Last edited: Mar 29, 2009
  11. theobserver is a simple guy... Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    338
    Now that's scary. You cannot prove it unless i learn it. Even if you think you can prove it, soon after you have proved it, I will prove you wrong even if I carry the same knowledge.

    There is a huge difference between man made beliefs and beliefs popped up due to natural phenomenon's. If someone says God is a 20 foot tall white dude with long white beard, they are talking about religious-man made idea of god. Not natures definition. It can be proved wrong.

    Now i would appreciate if you can use a spell check so i can avoid guessing what you were trying to tell me.
     
  12. cluelusshusbund + Public Dilemma + Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,000
    Yeah... we're on the sam page... the reason you dont share my beleifs is cause you havent tryed hard enuff to beleive the way i do.!!!

    What a shame... cause my beleifs are corect an you'rs ant... but un-like you... i have proof to bak it up.!!!


    O yeah... well i will learn a new beleif an double-prove you'r rong... plus... even tho i will have to dig him up... i bet my dad coud still beat you'r dad up... lol.!!!

    Well it jus so hapens that God is a 20 foot tall white dood wit a long white beard... an hes a poped-up natural phenomenon that you jus havent dug deep enuff to understan... an sinse it true... its imposible for you to prove it rong.!!!

    I thank you'r gonna try an use "spellin" as an escuse to get youself out of the hole youv'e dug for youself... cause not only were you unable to produce the proof you calme you have about Astrololgy... you also cant prove that Jesus ant 20 feet tall.!!!

    Let me guess... you mus be a Libra... cause LIbras are prone to lettin ther mouthe overload ther azz... eh.!!!
     
  13. KernNeart Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    94
    America-Saggitarius, Chinese-year of the horse
     
  14. Orleander OH JOY!!!! Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    25,817
    American Virgo, Chinese year of the horse as well. So if we went by the zodiac, we are very different. If we go by the Chinese, we are exactly the same.
     
  15. wise acre Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    726
    You would likely be extremely different by 'the zodiac'. Different moon signs, different rising signs, different placements for all your other planets. Different angles between the planets. Different midpoints. Etc.
     
  16. FelixC Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    134
    hi O:
    1. no, not really
    2. is that true?
    3. are there any scientific studies? is there a difference or any similarity between Chinese & Western astrology for people that are born the same Chinese year & same horoscope sign?

    like year of the Pig, Aries
     
  17. JackStars Registered Member

    Messages:
    5
    Yeah like cafeastrology does have a good chart. Anyone here remember this site http://www.astrologyjunction.com/ like 8 years ago, I think it did the same but for love. DO you know any other sites for that please and thank youuuuu

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  18. pjdude1219 The biscuit has risen Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    16,479
  19. Daecon Kiwi fruit Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,133
    Why would people have star signs if animals don't?

    After all, the idea of animals with star signs is pretty silly.
     
  20. Kristoffer Giant Hyrax Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,364
    If a rat was born in the year of the monkey will it bite Lionel's mother? Peter Jackson says 'yes'.
     
  21. Sylwester Kornowski Neutrinos are nonrelativistic Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    703
    Do you believe in the long-distance entanglement between minds and astronomical objects?
     
  22. Kristoffer Giant Hyrax Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,364
  23. Sylwester Kornowski Neutrinos are nonrelativistic Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    703
    Do you believe in quantum entanglement? Do you believe in the big bang?
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page