Scientists discover that atheists might not exist, and that’s not a joke

It proves there are documented incidents of atheists persecuting theists.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Well now that is a leap.
Picture one could have been a result of the theist commandment; "Thou shalt have no false Gods before me".
Picture two could be a result of theist worshippers killing the followers of those false Gods.

Don't you even dare to cast these aspersions on atheists, asshole!

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Alternatively you can use the google image search function and get an education in (amongst other things) modern history.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Dis-belief "goes to naught" in my religion specifically without the use of violence. Just a miracle waiting to happen."

 

Atheists?

 

Research on the internet is all I do all day long. I am very well informed on modern history.

This is another example of your impertinence and disrespect for others who are cut from a different cloth.

 

If daddy dresses up as Santa, Santa exists, as per definition.

Denial and rejection in full effect folks.

How could the natural world bring itself into being?

Surprise! Surprise! NOT.
Your a frickin atheist.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

What did you think there was a possibility that God could be wholly necessary, to explain the universe, and its functions?
Don't you get it yet?

Jan.

 

At least you wasn't silly enough to maintain the notion that the pigeon had an excessively credulous belief in and reverence for the supernatural.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

Jan.

 

You mean until you realised you are atheist, a person for whom there is no God.

Jan.

 

Only in the mind of a child. It is a subjective experience, until it is revealed that the bearded man in the red suit is daddy. At that point Santa is no longer real.

blah, blah...

Self organization and self assembly are scientifically proven methods. Did you not provide examples yourself?

And that proves I'm wrong? Hubris "Vanity" (a deadly sin)

Yes I thought about it and have come to the conclusion that a God was not necessary.

Yes I do and I do not accept the "common" definition of God as a sentient and motivated being.

And in the absence of a different definition of God by you or any other theist, I'll stick with the common definition, and that is wholly unacceptable as a cosmic imperative.

God is a metaphor, not an equation.

 

So it's a nameless religion.

Jan.

 

blah, blah.

 

No. Santa is right in front of them.
Santa is Santa, because of what Santa wears, and his white beard. If a woman put on a Santa suit, it is still classed as Santa. If you see someone walking down the road., in the middle of July, wearing a Santa suit, you will recognise that as Santa. Get over it.

I provided examples of an intelligent agency, causing salt particles to take on various forms, due to the manipulation of sound vibration.
As an atheist you just saw particles self-organise. This is the reality of our respective positions.

No. It is the reason you have this world view.

As an atheist, you had no choice but to come to that, or a similar conclusion.
You'll notice that most atheist, when asked will express the self in a similar way, as long as they are defending their position.

What do you accept? Mathematics?

Sound like a denial and rejection of God. But the acceptance of something that needn't be identified as God.

You deny and reject God, which is why you claim there has been no definition of God, from myself.

Jan.

 

///
So if someone dresses up as god, that means god exists. If someone dresses up as Odin, Odin exists. If someone dresses up as Donald Duck, Donald Duck exists.

<>

 

Why the need for adhoms?

Jan.

 

Someone dresses up as God?

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

Jan.

 

The post in which that claim appears is typical of your posting. Here's the rest of that post:

Notice how accurately my description of your posting predicted your response to that very post:

So the question remains, and we can repeat it here: "- - - - are you misrepresenting your ideas, as well as other people's? Are you bearing false witness against yourself as well?"

 

They are representing the forms of both characters, as they are perceived to exist. And those representations, like Santa Claus actually exist.

Jan.

 

No. I guess you'll have to spell it out.

In what way?

Jan.

 

///
Trying to avoid the point, as usual.

<>