Why should I have a complaint? Pointing out the clearly obvious to those too afraid to see it is a public service, there is certainly nothing new about my pitch and nothing new concerning your lies (apologetics) in a vain attempt to rewrite your bible.
How about, no. Why should you have a complaint? Quite frankly, that is just plain stupid. Read your topic post; you're complaining about religion.
I know but from what I've seen, pointless blithering seems to be all you have. That's understandable given the nonsense you are forced to defend.
Well, you should probably come up with something better. Just making it up as you go is fantasy play.
It is quite simple and you have completely misconstrued what the passage says (deliberately). The passage orders you to HATE your family or you won't be a disciple of christ. The word used is HATE, do you understand the meaning of that word?
In this case my advice is to ask Jesus, which is easy enough to do since He has already told us what He means:
"If any one comes to me and does not hate his own father and mother and wife and children and brothers and sisters, yes, and even his own life, he cannot be my disciple. Whoever does not bear his own cross and come after me, cannot be my disciple. For which of you, desiring to build a tower, does not first sit down and count the cost, whether he has enough to complete it? Otherwise, when he has laid a foundation, and is not able to finish, all who see it begin to mock him, saying, 'This man began to build, and was not able to finish.' Or what king, going to encounter another king in war, will not sit down first and take counsel whether he is able with ten thousand to meet him who comes against him with twenty thousand? And if not, while the other is yet a great way off, he sends an embassy and asks terms of peace. So therefore, whoever of you does not renounce all that he has cannot be my disciple."
(Luke 14.26-33↱, RSV)
No wonder
you needed a separate thread↗ in which you could try to make your demand without having to see the rest of the text; your answer, thus far is already on record. That is, if we wish to know what Jesus means in Luke 14.26, by he word "μισέω", we can read verses 27-33.
Meanwhile, consider the prospect of one who claims to not be of the faith wandering in and making the same ignorant complaint as how many before him, and if you can't figure out what Jesus is saying on this occasion, it's probably best that you're happy to not be a Christian. Meanwhile,though, let us consider Luke 14.27-33 directly:
"Whoever does not bear his own cross and come after me, cannot be my disciple. For which of you, desiring to build a tower, does not first sit down and count the cost, whether he has enough to complete it? Otherwise, when he has laid a foundation, and is not able to finish, all who see it begin to mock him, saying, 'This man began to build, and was not able to finish.' Or what king, going to encounter another king in war, will not sit down first and take counsel whether he is able with ten thousand to meet him who comes against him with twenty thousand? And if not, while the other is yet a great way off, he sends an embassy and asks terms of peace. So therefore, whoever of you does not renounce all that he has cannot be my disciple."
Now, then, what is your objection? Let us cover a base, here: The part where your objection is 14.25 sits aside for the moment, because if you complain about the word "hate", I'll ask what it means and then you'll remind me that's your question, and again I'll point back to 27-33. So let us look at that portion of the text. What about it do you object to? Try it this way: You have, as Christ puts it, counted the cost and apparently decided to not build the tower. Still, though, what objection do you have to the principle that if you decide to build the tower you should do it right? Consider the idea that the tower might collapse: Did it fall down because you built it wrong in order to accommodate your wife and spoil the kids, building luxurious rooms not bothered by annoying things like proper structural support? It's one thing to want a big home, but if they also want you to get rid of those posts because they're ugly? Well, can you not comprehend that setting aside the sentiment of wanting to please them might be the better thing to do in such circumstances? If you cannot renounce all of that long enough to build the tower safely, maybe your wife will huff that you don't love her enough, and your kids will flounce around about how much you hate them, and then you can roll your eyes and mutter, as you walk out of the room, "Jesus Fucking Christ!" But, hey, if the tower falls down, at least you didn't guarantee its destruction in order to please your wife.
Pretending you're stupid in order to complain about something really is stupid.
Pathetic non-analogous analogies seem de rigueur for believers struggling to defend the obscenities in their beliefs. Please don't stoop to that again.
Cowardly flight in order to reinforce the character you're playing as some manner of hubristic ignoramus is your own decision, but please do learn to read.
Precisely apologetics is a subject designed purely to rewrite the contradictions, absurdities and obscenities contained in your bible and are quite obviously a failure when examined by the thinking person.
You don't even know what you just said.
Figuring it out takes reading the passage not lying about what it says.
And we just read the passage, and it turns out you're wrong. Like I said, no wonder you needed another thread, because it really was a genuinely stupid sleight you attempted.
Think of it this way: Three posts in a row have you failed. Are you able to
not fail?
____________________
Notes:
Weigle, Luther, et al. The Bible: Revised Standard Version. New York: Thomas Nelson, 1971. University of Michigan. 6 August 2018. http://bit.ly/2rJddky