Why is the water molecule an allergen?

Discussion in 'Human Science' started by Jimmy-rigger, Sep 30, 2018.

  1. joepistole Deacon Blues Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    22,910
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. sideshowbob Sorry, wrong number. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,057
    That has nothing to do with what I said. I was only talking about what is really "internal".
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. Gawdzilla Sama Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,864
    They can't do both. Saliva has water in it.
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. billvon Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    21,635
    It's almost as if they have more accounts that you have replied to . . .
     
  8. Jimmy-rigger Registered Member

    Messages:
    28
    So what you're saying is all these cases are hoaxes and the National Biomedical Institute is also 'in' on the hoax for writing up a case report about it? https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5438944/
     
  9. origin Heading towards oblivion Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    11,888
    That is a really strange thing. I had not heard of this extremely rare condition. It would really suck.
     
  10. mathman Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,002
    Allergy to water molecule seems bizarre, since water molecules are all over inside our bodies (blood, etc.). Someone really allergic to water probably would drop dead immediately.
     
  11. billvon Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    21,635
    Nope. We are saying that you are a troll who posts the same nonsense material over and over here.

    (Up next! This little girl is allergic to air!)
     
  12. Jimmy-rigger Registered Member

    Messages:
    28
    I remember someone tried to rationalize this as these people who are allergic to water aren't 'really human' at all and something supernatural is going on .
    What are your thoughts? Do you suppose all these cases are hoaxes? I'm unsure of what the purpose of such hoaxes is though but I do find it strange how you never ever heard of being allergic to the water molecule until recently
     
  13. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    18,935
    Oh, for Pete's Sake, Jimmy.

    The medical write ups are not hoaxes. They describe Aquagenic Urticaria - a skin condition.

    They also don't mention 'just one cup of water will KILL this girl DEAD!'

    It's the news rags that mangle and distort the facts into ridiculous caricatures of the facts.

    Do you really not know the difference between a medical report and the National Enquirer?

    You're going to get eaten alive by the internet.
     
  14. Jimmy-rigger Registered Member

    Messages:
    28
    Then how come the girl's parents said she once drunk a mouthful of water by mistake and her body went into shock, so she had to be injected with adrenaline in order to save her life?

    and the fact they react internally when drinking water says it's a lot more than just a skin condition that only affects the skin.

    The same girl's parents said she had a surgery to get her appendix removed, and the surgeons used no 'water based' products, in a 'world first'. Unfortunately she then was given a drip, but had a massive whole body reaction because the drip was 'water based' (quote) and water was going into her bloodstream.
     
  15. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    18,935
    For all we know, she poured half of it down her front, where it reacted on her skin.

    Trust medical reports, not rag newspapers.
     
  16. Jimmy-rigger Registered Member

    Messages:
    28
    Whose to say she doesn't have a more severe case of what was in that medical report?
     
  17. Jimmy-rigger Registered Member

    Messages:
    28
    Also how do you explain her reacting to a drip, a drip is having water infused into your bloodstream directly. Yet she had a massive whole body reaction to it, causing 'giant blisters' to appear all over her body..
     
  18. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    18,935
    Who's to say she doesn't have wings and a tail?

    I prefer facts to conjecture.
     
  19. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    18,935
    Saline, to be accurate. This thread is already full of weasel words.

    Citation from a medical report, please.
     
  20. Jimmy-rigger Registered Member

    Messages:
    28
    Strawman. There's a wikipedia article on aquagenic urticaria so it seems as though being allergic to the water molecule is a real thing.

    There's doctors cited in the articles about her and you can google them and see they're real doctors. One of them who diagnosed her with an allergy to the water molecule is an immunologist who worked at Birmingham Children's Hospital and treated Heidi there.
     
  21. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    18,935
    It is not straw man to require a citation from a reputable source. Rags don't count.

    Indeed. I have tried to point you at it several times. It is a skin condition.

    "...it is not a true histamine-releasing allergic reaction like other forms of urticaria."

    No, that's your job.

    So far, you're presented a bunch of rags, and one medical report - the latter only mentioning swelling of the mouth and throat which resolved spontaneously.

    Start presenting some facts about your assertion, or this is going to go south fast.
     
  22. RainbowSingularity Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,447
    like the sudden invention/discovery of anti biotics

    modern medical science has allowed hundreds of millions to survive while only 3 generations ago they would have been wiped out.
    vacines, anti-biotics, anti bacterials, blood transfusions, modern basic surgical processess.
    starvation dietary recovery knowledge/science...

    infant mortality
    post natal mortality
    genocide

    basic washing routines for personal hygine(only about 3 generations old, saves millions of lifes every year)

    munchausen by proxy is still very common in 2nd & 3rd world cuntrys, even 1st would countrys it is still a regular statistic.
    child abuse, domestic homicide(leading form of homicide)
    infanticide... the list goes on...

    maybe the child was poisoned by chlorine gas as a baby by someone.
     
  23. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    18,935
    Could we stay on-topic please?
     

Share This Page