This History Will Be

Why is it every time one sees any reference to bb that it is shown as expansion within and by a cone?...... (1/bb)*n @ and within (1'/1*n)N. ...... Since I don't always have access to a computer, I have difficulty in communicating. So you must bear with me.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Because showing a layered ball would be difficult. The cone represents a section of the ball/globe/roundness.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Sir, Mr. Gawdzilla Sama, May I first suggest that you refrain from going to NYC and the Brooklyn bridge. The inverse g r^2 law is beautiful naturally, and is shown throughout Nature, I also appreciate what it means for ftl. Obviously mechanically it means to accelerate 'large cross sections' to relativistic velocities.It would be exciting if instead of large cross sections, but small cross sections but at super ultra relativistic mass which would be much more manageable within the device. By controlling the amount of mass per quadrant gives it a direction, by attracting behind the device it produces a deceleration. Place the most mass at any point 360^2 and the machine will go there. However, were anyone to do what I just wrote about with out the rest of it, they would experience spallation. One will gain motion, but when attempting ftl the machine and it occupant would become atomized.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Too early for word salad.

 

only to the living
once you are dead your morals are somwhat useless
thus subjective reality of purported moralistic propositional reality.

unles you live many times longer than humans and thus conceptualise a proportion of moral judgement over a species to individuate the moral compass at zero to the individual... ?
... in which case maybe you need to make a new word for it.

 

Qcd, qed, can that 'style's' apply to 'strings'? Is there a 'communications' between 'strings'? Is there a color and flavor, relative to where the 'string' is formed, ie. environmental geometry and style. Pressure density reliant. Differences in pressure density may produce differences in 'string' properties, similar to but not the same as. 1. The spacial area has background and foreground emr fields, embedded in space-time as a property of formation at the same time as the strings formed. Oscillations between 'strings' must cover the distance between each other, for each others communication through the emr space of the emr. Since emr is not the only field then the incision of its first order must be the pressure density fields and waves, within the field and between the fields. Can the oscillation be the transmission messenger from one 'string' to the other? that produces transverse waves(?) within the emr and density fields. While at the same time the oscillations may produce locality of diversity, ie. geometrical emr and g density style that 'amass' around the 'string'. The 'string' from its' formation vibrating the emr and g field density, while also being vibrated by them and in them by the compression pressure density 2. I am making the assumption that bb mass is the center of a huge collision, and that collision has exactingly specific geometry, stylistically. and that as a part of the geometry, 'strings' form. Since there evolves differences in the evolving geometry/style, differing densities exist within the geometrical structure, therefore, differences in 'color- flavor'. 3. Color and flavor and mass per volume area of 'strings' may be embedded as a part of the geometry. Different totals per environment locations.......Now all of that is a background for the evolution of states as collisions, frictions, motions as compressed compression pressure densities, (dm) from the geometrical styles from and of the background collision, 'squeeze' the background 'strings' in the foreground. The 'strings' being compressed within its own environmental background emr and g density have an instantaneity of compression and transformation going through its' cycle to 'grb'. The differing strengths of some grbs may be due to volumetric string styles, compressing and evolving........As for the fuel for ftl, ???? is it possible to use emr within emr for 'mass' formation? After all it is bulky to have the machinery to accelerate +_0v mass to .99999999 etc./ c. That would mean an emr inertial mass of I^4. With mostly unlimited velocity, ergo unlimited 'mass', ergo very, very 'fast'......... Remember neither Sir Issac or Albert knew any thing about bb, dm, bh, de, or compressed compression pressure density as gravity density, but Sir Issac certainty was closer to it. Though some may argue that gr answers that question, one should remember that a collision, friction, motion produces its' own space for the forming gravity density at that location. Forms it and maintains it.

 

Duality. Particle-wave. Wave-particle. Can I^4)^....n ke f pressure density exist by duality for (as) gravity density.? for (mechanical I^4)(natural I^4)'/r^2]G. It certainly would be nice, then measurement. And ftl as a first order by-product. Ftl is the measurement of mm'/r^2]G.

 

I understand that strings is basically a 'maybe-mathematical' existent. I must say in every compression, strain-stress resonances exist.

 

Every compression has strings at ~10-35, whether a snowflake flying through the air, or bb. You create strings every time you walk. You create strings at every style of compression. Move. Clap your hands......Which brings me to another event that I am finally upset at. Some acquaint gravity with motion only. Motion is only one small part of force which is gravity density. It is the compression of and from collision, friction and motion which creates and is gravity density. add this to the laws of Sir Issac and Ae.

 

Howdy.....Hello.....As one ages, health issues evolve. I'll be back soon.

 

super positioning & quantum duality are what spring to mind as related questions.
probably more soo a different discussion,, however how does quantum duality deal with the aspect of individuality/unique process as a potential ability to duplicate a certain particle/thing/point in time & space etc...

if quantum duality is able to be managed is that the same as creating something new or simply copying over something into another position, kinda like the sci-fi idea of matter transfer "beam me up"...

does quantum duality have any different property to time space(space-time) ?
thus can quantum duality happen and not contradict current space-time theory's etc ..
(ive been wondering about this for a few years without any real effort to study it)

 

modern generic mental capacity to formulate complex ideas and work with them mentally.
as society advances and the mental ability of children is increased, the ability of adults to think about complex things becomes more probable.

in the not too distant past being able to read & write made you almost equal to a god.

 

Hello, [(mechanical apple + geometry @ sr @ mass times motion to light speed) (mc2) /r2], measures gravitational density over distance.

 

Hello, 1. v^2=GM, this is most common, true, but not complete. Collision, friction, motion(v) created by dark matter, is compressed compression pressure density, which is gravity density, geometry, styles of act, exactingly specific, and states and styles of force. GM is one part of it ............2. A one dimensional style, in a two dimensional area [(within)-( between)] the edges of standing fields, (though not exactly between, because the standing field forces penetrate each others edges),,,,,,,being within a three dimensional, resonating multi fields- inter spaced with travelling waves between the fields and within the fields of different force strengths, object,,,,,,,as a part of a four dimensional space geometry stylistically,,,,,,,,in a five dimensional area.......for strain-stress-strings, of multiple sizes, vibrations, force volumes per areas, all relative to the first order force energy interactions.

 

I want to know why so much of my writings have been deleted. Can you say, or are you not able to understand?

 

Maybe because you write stuff like this:

It looks like a chicken pecking at the keyboard wrote that.

 

Howdy, Hello,,,,,,,,,,,Yes, in the garden, when AE and IN were playing with their apples, they were mechanical, such that [(sr) with its' mass volume approaching infinity] becomes proportional, equal to and greater than (by machine diameter) to natural m / r^2 }G. It is not possible for human to achieve the m of natural mass with its' large size, but with a small apple as the volume area mass increases, the natural mass 'attracts' it. Each attracts the other. Very large speeds are available.

 

the suns gravitational field
sun spots
coronal mass ejections ...

do we have our very own living example we are yet to understand ?

 

The obviousness is sometimes not so apparent. It may take decades of searching and writing of study. Then one day, there it is. As plain as the nose on ones' face. Recall in my posts I had mentioned that compressed compression pressure density from collision, friction and the state of motion is immensely cold. (yet, it is also very 'hot', aside of that) Cold in space attracts heat. That heat, its' composition and compositional area forms a surrounding "chemistry". Gas clouds around cold gas clumps. I have been looking for my geometries since 1964. What is obvious is that a particular infra-red frequency and intensity is able to 'see' the 'heat' inside the clouds. It is only by chance that a prof. took some measurements of some small cold gas clumps, as a by-product of the major study of cluster formation. Embedded within the clouds and plainly for everyone to see are 'resonance'-'standing-fields and waves'. A normal collision geometry. As soon as those structures are measured and 'defined by the classicalists' a new page to astronomy-cosmology will be added.......Also many of my posts are missing.