division by race division by political party affiliation division by religion division by ethnicity who gains by these divisions?
That would be the federal reserve. But giving an artist money for a sculpture is somehow not different from giving someone a break from making their own house on govt land. Land which was sequestered for them.
I thought POTUS files tax returns but is not required to make them public, which happens to be the same for everybody Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
POTUS should be filing tax returns like everyone else. But how are we to know he did if no one gets to see them, publicly or not? As I understand it we're talking about 6 years of tax returns, which are under "audit". By whom?
What ever the equivalent of our (Australian) taxation office Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
So far Trump has installed his own gang in all the high places. Fom the courts, to the IRS (internal revenue service), to law enforcement. Money can buy you a lot of freedom from regulation in the US.
It sounds altruistic in a sense, but it assumes that descendants of former slaves aren't able to make it on their own, and need a hand out. In the end, isn't that somewhat insulting? Does this ''repair'' the damage that was done? Is there any way to ever really ''make up for'' such atrocities, like slavery, the Holocaust, etc.?
victimization if you can convince someone that they are a victim even by giving them something to "compensate" for their victimization then you have accomplished convincing the poor wretches that they are victims which fosters a victim mindset which makes them pawns in the broader game a victim mindset is a defeatist mindset ergo much easier to control when you convince someone that they are a victim who gains?
It assumes no such thing. Consider it back pay. And you can never make up for it, but does that mean we shouldn't try?
Anyone who proposes that this creates a victim class forgets that there was a true victim class and the repercussions are still felt. The damage done can never be repaid in monetary terms, but that is not the point of reparation. IMO, reparation is a public gesture in recognition of past wrongs, and the recompense should be in a form of permanence that continues to repay for the hundreds of years of great evil inflicted on a people with a small but enduring benefit. Hence my original proposition of a "protected" monetary trust which yields a small yearly benefit to as many direct descendants of slavery that can be found to have a valid moral claim. It is a symbolic gesture, which teaches that if not guarded against any form of inequality, anyone can become a victim of a "superior" class. Normally we erect statues to memorize and celebrate heroes. Would a statue of a slave communicate the proper message? This is the moral message contained in the Declaration of Independence and the Bill of Rights, in "recognition" that all human life must be treated on equal terms. A noble principle.
I don't think that we can go backwards, and correct such atrocities. But, we can move forward, offering a better future. Promising to never allow that to happen again. Vowing as a government, and culture, to make it so. The American culture, it seems to think that everything gets resolved with enough money thrown at it. Like if your loved one gets killed by a drunk driver, and you sue the drunk driver and win $1 million. I suppose that is justice, but that doesn't change the fact that your loved one is dead. What is $1 million to someone who has suffered such a loss? I suppose this is an effort, but it still doesn't change the pain of history.
you dont see the same folk rallying against suing people for defamation & emotional damages. total hypocrisy
There does seem to be a qualitative difference between defamation and two hundred years of being whipped or hanged for looking at a white woman.....Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!