The subtlety was the ambiguity in the tread title: between 1. Its being an actual video in the sense that any video is an actual video, and 2. Its being a depiction of actual events. I was trying to subtly suggest 2. without actually (falsely) saying it.
is that facial composition software being used as a skin to apply his face and move it ? thats amazing to think you now cant rely on video to be real. thats how good the software has become. its a bit boring for my taste, too usa slap stick, not enough mental content. is that the cathedral or norte dame organ music playing ?
No. If they did that they could have him say whatever they want. This is actual footage of him saying actual things, edited and spliced onto a spacesuit.