Do all races have the same genetic IQ potential?

Discussion in 'The Cesspool' started by Felicity Isherwood, May 11, 2019.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    18,935
    I'm a member of the Blue-eyed race. I'd say our IQ is definitely higher than that of the Brown-eyed race.
    I don't really need to test that assertion; it's the "obvious" pattern we see everywhere.
     
  2. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. Felicity Isherwood Banned Banned

    Messages:
    25
    Taxa in biology aren't defined by colors. Are you really this thick?

    Do you think race IQ hasn't been tested? You must be a total ignoramus.
     
  4. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    18,935
    Correct. They aren't defined by eye-colour any more than they are defined by skin colour.

    The entire human race is one species.
     
  6. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. Felicity Isherwood Banned Banned

    Messages:
    25
    It's impressive how you can fit so much confused gibberish into one slogan, but I suppose you are just parroting it. Humans are a subspecies, not a species or a race. They can be divided into races, which are infrasubspecific. Sorry, I know you've had "one race the human race" drilled into your soft head ad nauseam by daytime TV. But biological science says something different.
     
  8. Felicity Isherwood Banned Banned

    Messages:
    25
  9. spidergoat pubic diorama Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    54,036
    You proved it just then. The term cultural Marxism is a white supremacist meme. The Nazis used to say "international Jew" the same way.
     
  10. Felicity Isherwood Banned Banned

    Messages:
    25
    "White supremacist" is anti-white cultural-Marxist meme for patriotic whites that don't want to become a minority in their homelands. It's a lie, a lie from anti-white scum.
     
  11. spidergoat pubic diorama Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    54,036
    I'm not anti-white, just pro-human.
     
  12. Felicity Isherwood Banned Banned

    Messages:
    25
    Bullshit. You call whites who want to not be put down with cultural-Marxist fake science and want normal border control "white supremacists". You're a victim blaming anti-white scoundrel.
     
  13. RainbowSingularity Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,447
    asking such a question shows you are around 5 years short on catching up on modern reading around what IQ tests are and how they work.

    https://www.healthline.com/health/average-iq
     
  14. Felicity Isherwood Banned Banned

    Messages:
    25
    So an appeal to novelty, authority, and assertion. I fail to see any actual point you made.
     
  15. RainbowSingularity Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,447
    purely based on the type and quality of the childs schooling.

    cross referenced with localized cultural practice & language
    then cross matched with types and variants of mathematical systems and cultural practice around norms of thought.

    however... you would already know that if you bothered to do some basic study into the topic of your own thread.
     
  16. RainbowSingularity Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,447
    your good
    but not that good
    novelty has no baring on its own sense of authority and all personal freedoms of thought are assertions of free speech.

    see how you come undone inside your own propaganda.
     
  17. Felicity Isherwood Banned Banned

    Messages:
    25
    Wrong. Try starting here:
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4739500/
    Maybe you can learn to spell and string sentences together too.
     
  18. RainbowSingularity Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,447
    while you sound like an early 20's female seeking self actualisation inside a self justifying process(all very normal)
    if you changed you question to be of DNA
    to ask
    "Does DNA show different IQ scores?"
    you might have something interesting to discuss
    using the word race and DNA(via mocca-IQ-tests nonsense) together in such a broad sweep while disregarding such a vast array of critical aspects of human intelligence just puts you into the tin-foil hat group.
     
  19. RainbowSingularity Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,447
    which time era do you use to create your median IQ value to DNA ?
     
  20. iceaura Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    30,994
    I seriously believe nobody knows. I doubt the question makes sense, actually. Certainly IQ tests as currently administered and evaluated do not settle the question.
    And I seriously believe that neither the Australian Aborigines or the Japanese are a "race" - although I could be argued into such a classification by a rigorous racial classification protocol that delivered such a result from its handling of the species generally - note that such a classification system would not deliver anything like the current US sociological races (for starters there would be maybe seven "black" races and three "yellow" ones, and some of them would include white-skinned people).
    That's not how taxa in biology are defined.
    Meanwhile: No human race has been defined by shared ancestry, or any other scientific classification method. Human races are defined by social custom and circumstance, usually by sociologically significant aspects of culture or appearance, especially skin color. They vary by society, and time, and geographic region (for example: the Irish were "black", racially, in the US, until about 1840).
    I know it hasn't. No IQ testing protocol of any major sociological group has ever included a valid correction of its results for a single one of the dozens of environmental and sociological circumstances known to affect IQ scores.
    Currently extant humans are biologically classified as one species - Homo sapiens https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homo_sapiens.
    Maybe, in theory, the one species could be divided into biological races, but it has not been so divided. Nobody has done that yet.
    Infrasubspecific is a goofy term - where are you getting this bs from?
     
    Last edited: May 11, 2019
  21. spidergoat pubic diorama Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    54,036
    Scientific racism is pseudoscience.
     
  22. Michael 345 New year. PRESENT is 72 years oldl Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    13,077
    One race - HUMAN - applies to all 7 billion+ people on the planet

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
    Gawdzilla Sama likes this.
  23. RainbowSingularity Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,447
    a 5 year old or a 75 year old ?
    what language are they being tested in ? japanese ? old or new japanese ?
    can they read that language ?

    oh ! you mean a western high school grading IQ test for western 16 year old children whom have completed 11 years of western 1st world education ?

    do they have any psychiatric illnesses or disorders ?
    where do they sit on the autism scale ?

    what is their reading writing comprehension score ?

    what is their standard deviation from mean test results for the last 4 years for mathematics, reading & writing of their peers ?

    are you wanting to talk science ?
     
    Michael 345 likes this.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page