Thoughts

Discussion in 'The Cesspool' started by river, Oct 1, 2019.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. river

    Messages:
    17,307

    Disagree arfa ( high lighted )

    Vacuum is sucked out of the bottle , not put into it . By the physical .

    Further without the physical structure of the bottle its self , where would your nothing exist ? No where .
     
    Last edited: Oct 1, 2019
  2. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. davewhite04 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,328
    How does the air get into the bottle? We have to breathe it in, a bottle cannot do that.

    EDIT: That is specifically aimed at River.
     
    Last edited: Oct 3, 2019
  4. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. river

    Messages:
    17,307
    New





    Strange question really .

    Air flows around the bottle , all the time , regardless of whether you are there or not .
     
  6. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. davewhite04 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,328
    I agree 100%. hopefully the shit won't begin.
     
  8. TheFrogger Banned Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,175
    A vacuum isn't "nothing." Space still exists there.
     
  9. davewhite04 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,328
    What is space?
     
  10. Xelasnave.1947 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,502
    At any point , anywhere out there something passes thru any point travelling along a geometrically infinite number of trajectories, from perhaps ,originating from every object in the observable universe and certainly the radiation from the big bang such that for me it is difficult to conceive there is any place where there is nothing..space is full of something ..not an eather mind you just lots of stuff.
    Alex
     
  11. RainbowSingularity Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,447
    for argument sake

    why could vacuum not be a natural state ?

    a thing in space is not compressed by vacuum it is condensed by gravity ?
     
  12. TheFrogger Banned Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,175
    "Space" is "room." We could not move without space.
     
    davewhite04 likes this.
  13. davewhite04 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,328
    A good test.

    Leave a plastic bottle in a dusty cupboard and see if dust settles inside. Simple science test.

    This way you can find out first hand and keep away from secondhand information in books/internet etc.
     
  14. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    18,959
    You wouldn't be able to find a volume of space that does not contain photons. It would have to be at absolute zero. And it would have to not even be accessible from anywhere else in the universe, else it would be bombarded by photons from those other places.
     
  15. RainbowSingularity Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,447
    an expanding plastic bottle that is rotating around a super massive coke machine that has small drinks fridges orbiting it ?
    (coke will likely steel my idea and make an advert now[& not pay me for it], it wont be the first, ok well actually the first i was asked and i said yes, i wasn't paid for it and it made quite a bit of good publicity however now i am particularily liking th eidea of orbiting coke machines and fridges inside a multi coloured galactic orbital frame with zooming views into worlds spinning around...)
     
  16. RainbowSingularity Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,447
    the difference is, you filled the coke bottle with air
    like saying a planet suddenly clicked into existence instantly from nothing...

    you are ignoring some pretty big fundamental concepts.
    i am well aware of new age(modern forward thinking secular tech orientated) christians who have some science knowledge.
    but you need to do your own homework on some things to realize that while some quantum stuff sounds very ... almost divine magical being like... a lot of the other stuff is very basic and practical like building a house
    hammers hitting nails
    walls being put up.
    fundamental concepts that required specific actions that in so define specific natures of those things

    like saying imagine a house with completely see through walls and no sound proofing
    so anything you say in any room is clearly audible in every other room at the same volume it is spoken

    then suggesting that house has the same properties as a normal common house that people live in.

    the abstract conceptualization of the principals are critical to the nature of the intrinsic functionality of the modes & processes of direct and indirect laws of physics and unknown physics.

    and where nothing has previously been trajectoried[?] ...
    and that what is passing through has come from somewhere else, a few hundred million years ago...
     
  17. Xelasnave.1947 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,502
    Absolutely.
    I sit by the scope when imaging and hold my finger in from of me and wonder how many things must reach it and from where ..
    Another thought exercise is to try to imagine the stuck with no ends and all the objects and perhaps creatures it could pass thru in its unending length.
    Then imagine every possible trajectory is a never ending stick.
    What struck me was your observation about temperature...I probably will be thinking about that all day.
    Alex
     
  18. Xelasnave.1947 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,502
    I often wonder about neutrinos and think of them travelling without ever "stopping" and so when I hold out my finger as I described above believe that it is reasonable to expect that a little piece of every part of the universe along every trajectory is passing thru the countless points you could find in just the tip...and so it would seem reasonable to assume that such is so for every point in the universe...including those points found in the most less dense regions of space...and as you say their ages could be millions of years and perhaps, indeed almost certainly billions of years old...think background radiation..we think of it relating it firstly to the visable spectrum but what other electromagnetic radiation may have set out at that time...I don't know as I have never considered that aspect until now...but why would things be limited to the small part of the spectrum humans can see...what else set out I wonder...
    Alex
     
    RainbowSingularity likes this.
  19. davewhite04 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,328
    I answered River's question, and he give a perfect reply.

    Continue your quest at a quantum level, you won't find a more perfect answer as River's.
     
  20. James R Just this guy, you know? Staff Member

    Messages:
    39,426
    The opening post here is an attempt (a) to carry on a discussion from a thread that was closed, and (b) to circumvent the opening poster's ban from posting to our Science subforums.

    This thread is closed.

    Apologies to the other participants who might have been participating in an interesting discussion. Try another thread, perhaps.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page