Agreed. I do spend to much time with you wallowing in the cesspit of ignorance. Still I like to help.
So you're claiming that there's a "galactic magnetic field" that a black hole can "focus" by somehow "shrinking the matter" inside itself? Where is the focal point of the focussed field? What effects does the focussing have? Have you done the maths to verify your hypothesis? What is the source of the galactic magnetic field you mention? Does anything apart from black holes focus it? What measurable effects does that have? Who have done the relevant measurements? You? What causes the matter in the black hole to shrink when it focusses the galactic magnetic field? Please explain that mechanism for me.
a few years ago i recal reading something about maybe Stephen Hawking & maybe someone else mentioning something about being unable to measure anything inside a black hole ?
There's no way to get a message about any measurement made inside a black hole back to the outside world. What's the relevance of your comment to the part of my post you quoted?
measuring a focused field theory verses mechanics regardless of a field existing or not existing being created by a black hole the ability to quantify it as being anything focused would be impossible only radiant(as you elude to)[i guess]
The point is that BH's per se, are not magnetic and any electric field will quickly be neutralized. The magnetic fields will though exist in and from the surrounding accretion disks, spiraling into the BH, and at the polar jets we often see resulting from the spacetime vicinity outside the EH, and due to the frame dragging effect. And while James is correct that nothing inside a BH will ever be transferred to outside, we do have some reasonably deduced information due to compulsory collapse edict once any collapsing mass reaches the Schwarzchild limit of that mass. We can then logically assume that all the BH is, is critically curved spacetime, until the singularity at the core is reached...a singularity as defined by the failure of our known laws to prevail in that quantum/Planck vicinity.
And we can logically assume that there is nonsense abound , from beginning to end , No need to highlight here .
Logic and you are distant entities river...I have yet to see you employ it. My summation is of course correct, and can be supported. Your's are simply river's ignorant thoughts. Seeya, I choose not to debate with you, a known troll at this time
Yet you are here spouting your opinion though . Why are you here in this thread pad ? Why bother , to your last statement .
Wrong...I'm actually spouting scientific facts and theory Correct your nonsense river. So that people can understand [newbies and guests] that you are banned from the sciences and they should take what you say with a grain of salt.
No, more lies and denial. The current model of the universe stands unchallenged. You have nothing to support your nonsense...What you claim in your link is, is a non peer reviewed article, and still highly debatable. No mention of electric/Plasma universe whatsoever..... Please see "The Electric.Plasma Universe: A mixture of mysticism, pseudoscience and nonsense:" for detailed currently accepted knowledge based on the latest research. Off again river, just took the time to tidy up your predictable nonsense. Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
Uhhh, no river, you're just a silly billy http://www.sciforums.com/threads/th...-mysticism-pseudoscience-and-nonsense.163484/ Dated May 2020