Teecher will be Fired for not takin covid vaccine.!!!

Discussion in 'Free Thoughts' started by cluelusshusbund, Oct 2, 2021.

  1. cluelusshusbund + Public Dilemma + Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,985
  2. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. billvon Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    21,634
    Because vaccines have something like a 10,000x better chance of keeping you alive than "trusting God."
     
  4. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. exchemist Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    12,451
    If she don't wahnt no vacseen, she mun be crap teecher, dat mah view.
     
  6. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. sculptor Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,466
    her body her choice
     
  8. exchemist Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    12,451
    Bullshit. What an idiotic statement.

    Her infected body can infect a load of children, who can pass it on to people who could get very ill. It beggars belief that, at this stage, anybody can still be so incredibly stupid as not to understand that we all need to do what we can to stop passing the virus on to OTHER PEOPLE. That is what this whole thing is about. It is emphatically NOT a matter of individuals doing what they like - and to hell with everyone else. She has a duty not to spread the infection in her place of work.
     
    James R, Kristoffer and Janus58 like this.
  9. Tiassa Let us not launch the boat ... Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    37,882
    I think it makes a certain point when people go out of their way to be offensive like that.

    I also think it makes a certain point that the political current runs as it does when people choose to behave that way.
     
    RainbowSingularity likes this.
  10. cluelusshusbund + Public Dilemma + Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,985
    I agree...

    ...its her choice to be fired...

    an lose the ability to pass on her irrational God/deadly medical beleifs to the children she claims to love.!!!

    A-Man.!!!
     
    foghorn likes this.
  11. sculptor Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,466
    “I will not be coerced into inserting something into my body that does not fall in line with my religious faith,” Edmonds said.

    again
    her body her choice

    If I understand what is happening----?
    She has chosen to take unpaid leave rather than inserting something into her body that does not fall in line with her religious faith.

    We do not have conclusive proof. But more and more studies and real-world evidence points to fully vaccinated people, who are not immunocompromised, are less likely to transmit the virus if they become infected,”
    said Brian Laird manager of Pharmacy Operations at OSF
     
  12. cluelusshusbund + Public Dilemma + Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,985
    Well ant that special

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

    ... i mean... whatever it takes to keep covid alive an well... Am-I-Right... an hell... thanks to irrational people like her... the chance of a new an deadlier variant becomes even more likely

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

    !!!
     
  13. billvon Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    21,634
    I agree.

    And the same for the school district. Their payroll, their choice.
     
  14. sculptor Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,466
    and then we have
    Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964
    which protects workers from discrimination on the basis of religion

    There seems to be an overabundance of people here who seem to think themselves morally superior.
    and maybe
    just maybe
    Those who would think that are usually wrong.
     
  15. cluelusshusbund + Public Dilemma + Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,985
    Guilty as charged... but its really not that dificult when some here set such a low bar... eh

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

    !!!
     
  16. sculptor Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,466
    <---------- libertarian socialist
     
  17. cluelusshusbund + Public Dilemma + Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,985
    If that means you dont thank you'r morally superior to anybody in this forum...

    its prolly...

    most likely...

    cause your not

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
    sculptor likes this.
  18. billvon Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    21,634
    And there seem to be a huge number of people whose political position can be summed up as intentional ignorance.
    Yep. Unless your religion requires (say) killing, injuring or infecting the children you are charged with teaching. Then you will be discriminated against - hard. Even if it's your religion.
     
  19. sculptor Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,466
    but, then again
    You could be wrong.
     
  20. billvon Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    21,634
    I sure could be.

    But given our history of protecting children against murder, injury and illness, I doubt it. Heck, we even prosecute parents who don't take their kids to the doctor because they "don't believe in medicine."

    In 2017, two parents in Oregon gave birth to premature twins. The twins were both in distress, struggling to breathe. One died four hours later. The medical examiner came by to certify the death. When he came by he discovered that the second twin was in very bad shape. He told them to take her to the hospital immediately, twice. "Thanks for your input," the parents said.

    When the medical examiner returned to the office, he called EMS to see if the child had been admitted. She had not. So he called CPS and they paid them a visit. The result was that the second twin was taken away - she, fortunately, survived. The parents were arrested and were found guilty of criminally negligent homicide.

    The reason they gave? They were Followers of Christ Church and "didn't believe" in medical care. They felt that such a right - the right to withhold medical care from children - was covered under religious freedom.

    So yes, I could be wrong. But from that example (and many others) it looks like your right to injure children is NOT protected under Title VII, even if your religion tells you to not believe in medicine. And I am glad about that.
     
  21. gmilam Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,522
    Satanic blood drinkers sacrificing children in a pizza joint = BAD.
    Teacher sacrificing children to Covid in the classroom = protected right.

    Got it!.
     
  22. sculptor Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,466
    again:
    We do not have conclusive proof
    however
    There seem many here who would "skip the trial and go straight to the hanging".
    alternately phrased
    "Don't confuse me with the facts, I have already made up my mind".

    OK
    Your choice
    your mind your choice
     
  23. billvon Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    21,634
    There sure are. But most of us are perfectly willing to follow the science, rather than the latest Facebook meme. (And most of us are perfectly willing to let hospitals decide on their own who to hire and fire, rather than impose our ethics on them.)
     

Share This Page