The first experimental measurement of God; to a 2-decimal point accuracy

Consider that, compared to a member who is not to be taken seriously↗ falsifying a quote↗, maybe I was in a bad mood when I said it, but not only does its message and purpose remain comprehensible these years later, it still seems relevant, too.

Moreover, that was also back in a time when certain discursive pretensions remained in play. Neither would the idea that, those years ago, the idea of not behaving antisocially was somehow a higher standard, an unfair expectation, be somehow irrelevant.

The irony is more subtle than taking it seriously is worth.

†​

While nothing about the point is definitive, consider that this is Sciforums: The symbols will mean different things to different people, but there is history, here, and within that history certain symbols have particular values or contexts of value. If, for instance, I have before encountered a similar problem with musicians, that might remind of human frailty more generally; but at Sciforums, within our ostensibly scientific context, certain differences can be important.

These years later, it remains at least as true as it was back then.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Seriously? You're saying the question of how a cubic 'functionality' results in the however-many different substructures in the mammalian brain, is a resolved question?

You can start with 8 brain cells? Or do you start with the blastula?

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Different brain networks create the same emotions. It is the way our brain gives meaning to bodily sensations based on past experience. Different core networks all contribute at different levels to feelings such as happiness, surprise, sadness and anger.

https://www.noldus.com/blog/how-emo...ks in the brain,, surprise, sadness and anger.

(Extract above shortened by me)

From the extract it appears emotions are born from past experiences which imbue us with experiences / emotions at the moment

Seems need early experiences embedded to enlarge our emotion collection

A section of the above is in another thread

http://www.sciforums.com/posts/3694782/

What George is explaining? - no idea

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Belief itself is God? Belief rules over nature, omnipotence, happiness, morality, omniscience, faith, hope, and wishes, etc… There is no in between when it comes to belief, you need it, and if you have it you are an Angel of rising omnipotence, and hope.

 

[GE Hammond MS physics]
Oh for chrissakes – you mean to tell me your above statement is all you have to say about my comprehensive
post #680 ? What are you a comedian?

I thought you were a serious poster! Apparently I was mistaken!

Of course the origin of all of brain structures from embryology to adulthood is "settled science".

The only thing that is NOT settled science is the origin of
THE STRUCTURAL MODEL OF PERSONALITY
and Hammonds theory that it is caused by the CUBIC STRUCTURE OF THE BRAIN

And that's the only thing that I'm here to talk about, and if you don't want to talk about my explanation of why the CUBIC BRAIN explains it – we have nothing further to discuss –

PLEASE REPLY TO MY POST #680 !

George

 

[GE Hammond MS physics]
Look Afra, all of that IS KNOWN SCIENCE. There are textbooks on embryology and a million illustrated articles on cell cleavage and embryology on the Internet. I'm not gonna sit here and recite known TEXTBOOK science.
... The only "internal brain structures" that we are interested in here, are the (obviously cubic) brain structures that relate to human personality structure.
... Okay, that is relatively recent AND NOT IN THE TEXTBOOKS – so I will explain it to you here – it begins with a thin wispy connection structure between the 8 cells of the 8 cell stage – and as the brain matures that turns into the FORNIX – the largest and most obvious internal structure in the brain. Throughout embryology and growth it serves to connect the "8 basic OCTUPOLE LOBES of the CUBIC BRAIN".

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

This is the mature FORNIX and as you can see it includes the hippocampal formation.
... Okay now we go to a close-up of an actual human brain to see what these structures look like –

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

Okay, as you can see the hippocampus is connected to the "medial septal nuclei", and so are the mammalary bodies. The late and great Prof. Jeffrey Gray proved that this structure which he namrd the "SHS" (septo-hippocampal system) actually controlled one of the primary personality syndromes of Man known as "ANXIETY" – and then Hammond in a peer-reviewed paper (1994) showed that it also controlled Gray's well known orthogonal dimension "IMPULSIVITY" – and this began the scientific identification of "cubic brain structure" with human "personality structure". Hammond later demonstrated that the SHS actually controls all 13 cubic brain" personalities" – and the reason is of course that a CUBE HAS 13 SYMMETRY AXES.

Okay Afra, that's a lot of explanation to digest in one sitting, so I'll leave off here but I think I have substantially answered your question.

Now let me add one more note – if I think you have a serious and constructive attitude – I'll talk to you ad infinitum – but if I detect that you are argumentative and only interested in scoring "amateur argument points" – I won't spend much time at all talking to you !

George

(Post 680 reproduced exactly I didn't want to keep scrolling back to check it)

hippocampus is connected to the "medial septal nuclei

Never will be. No such animal

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Well there's the thing George; if it is settled and the anatomists and medical researchers don't have any questions left, how is it related to your theory, which you tell us is not resolved?
I mean, suppose you're studying medicine and you're in the lab. The assignment is the dissection of a mammal brain.
Where does the student need to look to find your cubic symmetry? Or should they look for it in a mammalian embryo?

See? Right there you say the brain has this cubic structure, do you mean the structure is hidden after some stage of embryonic development?
It's just not all that clear what it is you mean, by "structure", except you've posted images of the early embryo; I assume it's the blastula so there's no neural tube yet.

Or what?

 

[GE Hammond MS physics]
Certainly it's a "resolved question" – do you realize HOW OLD this subject field is? 135 years ago Wilhelm Roux performed the most FAMOUS experiment in the history of biology! –

In 1885, Roux published experiments in which he took 2 and 4 cell frog eggs and killed half the cells with a hot needle. They grew into HALF FROGS (either L-R or Dorso-Ventral halves) thus proving that entire body geometry comes directly from the 1st, 2nd (and indubitably the 3rd) cleavage of the egg!

And that irregardless of "gastrulation" !

For crying out loud Arfa – try and make some kind of a reply to my Post #680 which I wrote specifically for you !

George

 

Wilhelm Roux
Home
Science
Biology
Biologists
Wilhelm Roux
German zoologist

By The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica • Edit History
Wilhelm Roux, (born June 9, 1850, Jena, Saxony [Germany]—died Sept. 15, 1924, Halle, Ger.), German zoologist whose attempts to discover how organs and tissues are assigned their structural form and functions at the time of fertilization made him a founder of experimental embryology.


Born: June 9, 1850 Jena Germany
Died: September 15, 1924 (aged 74) Halle Germany
Subjects Of Study: biological development fertilization morphogenesis
A student of German biologist Ernst Haeckel, Roux studied in Jena, Berlin, and Strasbourg. He was an assistant at the Institute of Hygiene in Leipzig (1879–86) and professor at the universities of Breslau (1886–89), Innsbruck, Austria (1889), and Halle (1895–1921).

Michael Faraday (L) English physicist and chemist (electromagnetism) and John Frederic Daniell (R) British chemist and meteorologist who invented the Daniell cell.
BRITANNICA QUIZ
Faces of Science
Galileo Galilei. Anders Celsius. You may recognize their names, but do you know who they really are? Gather your data and test your knowledge of famous scientists in this quiz.

Believing that mitotic cell division of the fertilized egg is the mechanism by which future parts of a developing organism are determined, Roux began in the 1880s an experimental program using frog eggs. He destroyed one of the two initial subdivisions (blastomeres) of a fertilized frog egg, obtaining half an embryo from the remaining blastomere. From his results, he concluded that determination of future parts and functions had already occurred in the two-cell stage and that each of the two blastomeres had already received the determinants necessary to form half the embryo. His theory was later negated, however, when German biologist Hans Driesch, working with sea urchin eggs, obtained small but fully developed embryos from both initial blastomeres.

(My bold and enlarged text)

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Irregardlessly, I feel I should say, by God Sir, you are well situated to espy things most hidden!

 

[GE Hammond MS physics]
Dear kx000 – I'm with you my friend – anyone who is sympathetic to religion is on the right side of history.
... However – I'm here to tell you (in fact present proof) that the "age of faith is over", and that we are now living in the age of scientific proof – proof that there is a real God !
... Philosophy and Theology are now going to have to come to grips with: –

The World's First Experimental Measurement of God; to a 2-Decimal Point Accuracy

And it's not that complicated – I think the average philosopher, scientist or theologian can come to a full understanding of it within a matter of days – psychologists in even a shorter time than that.

I can assure you personally, that I am greatly relieved to find out that there is a REAL GOD !

George

 

And yet dispite

you cannot present said scientific proof (only CLAIMS (ad nauseum)) when

Weird

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

[GE Hammond MS physics]
I can spot psychotic evil long before most – I only regret it took me 80,000 hours of study over 40 years- after taking 2 degrees in physics – to figure out why so many can't !

George

 

Took you that long over that period as well as that education to spot psychotic evil when a uneducated 3 year old child can spot psychotic evil in 2 minutes

I'm speechless

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

[GE Hammond MS physics]
You do us a great service "Spike"
in overplaying your hand, no
wonder you're a paramedic,
and not a scientist !

George

 

No idea what that means

I didn't know people had this amazing ability to speak in tongues while using English words

You manage to do so easily

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

You appear, as another poster put it sloppy, and I am in agreement, with language

I am not a paramedic

Retired now and no longer registered

My former qualifications were Registered Nurse and Midwife

I also hold an Associate Diploma in Occupational Health and Safety

Also worked over about a 15 year period in the Off Shore Oil Rigs position Safety Training Coordinator (STC) where I was responsible for assisting oil rigs crews to upgrading their skills to advance to higher paid positions

In addition to being responsible for the medical care of up to 100 persons (over 100 Off Shore Oil Rigs require Doctors to be on board)

Other qualifications - Sure - 4 years in the Royal Australian Air Force as a Radio Technician - Ground

Back to Oil Rigs I trained in Singapore and obtained my Captain of Escape Vessels (Lifeboats) Certificate

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

Pinterest

This could be me, blowing my own trumpet, if I wasn't so modest and retiring

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

Your constant whining about not being understood makes me wish I also could play this instrument

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

so I could play something suitable when you rant on gibberish about discovering god and how long it took and only your qualifications allowed you to do so

Get over yourself

Pauses for breath

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

My apologise to other posters for my ranting on buuut I really needed to

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

Tenor

Ummmmm I look different from this angle

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

makeagif.com

 

I live as faith. With faith you respect two things; women, and life.

 

Guessing you are both meaning religious faith

Shouldn't respect be obligatory without religious faith being a requirement?

Also if religious faith only provides (applies) respect to women and life such respect is as weak as a cockroach broken leg and not worth having

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

[GE Hammond MS physics]
Many are religious
– few are scientists.
But even less are
– religious scientists!

George