He sleeps with young boys, has them around all the time. If they were little girls instead, well, would you think something was wrong? Vote in the MJ poll.
Why is this in the Religion forum? Is it because it follows the Catholic doctrine so closely? Anyways, Michael Jackson doesn't molest children, he makes love to them. (He's probably guilty)
He's probably guilty, but come on, it's michael jackson. He brought us thriller and the moonwalk. I think the least we can do is let him fuck the odd kid here and there. Somethings seriously wrong with the world when big superstars aren't allowed to do whatever they want. Little known fact; Mamma cass used to love eating babies, everyone knew it at the time, but it was ok because she was mamma cass. If you give that much more to humanity than the average person, surely you can take that much more too. It's only fair. Chuck berry had a fetish for food torture. He used to tape eggs to the backs of weasels, stick carrots in cracks in rocks and watch hungry donkeys desperately lick and gnaw at the rock for hours, that sort of thing. This is a felony in the civilised world. But, chuck berry would actually recieve hungry animals as gifts from the president. Elvis had a thing for smearing his feces on elderly people, you best believe he had free reign to satiate his desires wherever he wanted, whenever he wanted and on whomever he wanted. He was the king. Are you going to lock up the king for putting his shit on some old geezer? Please, they should be so lucky. These kids who were fucked by jackson should feel honoured. Michael jackson's cock has been in THEIR ass. Oh poor baby Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! I feel so sorry for you living it up at the neverland ranch, getting free alcohol and having an outlandishly fantastic time most could only dream about at perhaps the funnest address on earth, climaxing with a hot make out session and solid dicking from the great MJ himself. Are you sure you didn't win some bizarrely awesome radio competition? No? just extremely lucky huh? Gee, let me get out my wallet you unfortunate "victim", haha, I mean right? It's pretty ridiculous.
juss b cos he gave us some crappy hits , doesnt give him a right to molest young kids - that is pathetic !!!
Until the court finds him guilty I don't know and I really don't care. We pay more attention to this crap rather than things that need paying attention to in life. This society has its priorities set wrong and I just hope we can keep an eye on the REAL problems that we face rather than this MEDIA CIRCUS EVENT!
I would say that most of the people who would respond with a solid "guilty", or "not guilty" to this question are entirely unqualified to decide and should leave the answer to those who have seen all the evidence. If they sit around watching the trial all day, they may have received enough information to judge.
no offence but i find that there soooo much publicity over his case very disgusting, thats why i belive this thread deserves to stay in the cesspool.
Although i dont feel ashamed to say that i used to like his Music and i still do, and would continue to...(Thriller was hell of an album)
here's why its simple: he's f***ed up, its obvious that he did it, and i dont want child molesters running around in the world, able to do it again.
