premarital sex a sin?

Discussion in 'Religion Archives' started by weed_eater_guy, Sep 13, 2005.

  1. spidergoat pubic diorama Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    54,036
    What is marriage?
    Is it a monopoly by an institution like a church to control breeding? What if there were no church? If you and your mate were all alone, can you marry yourselves?
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. Lawdog Digging up old bones Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,050
    As believers we try not to get caught up in the pleasures of THIS WORLD which lead men often into idolatry. Since SEX is the ultimate physical ectasy, it must be avoided and fled from if it is not justified by God (ie outside marriage). That is fornication, illicit sex, which scripture condemns. True SEX should mean giving your entire being selflessly to someone else, as an expression of the commitment of your entire life to that person. Fornication is never innocent, and whoever fornicates LIES to the other person, which is not an act of LOVE but of hate! Since humans are weak they are drawn by the allure of ectasy and commit this lie, and so, although it causes spiritual death, God will forgive the sinner and bring him back to spiritual life. Every effort should be made to avoid this transgression when dating, if you make a mistake that is human, however if you cannot cease from this impious sin while dating a particular would-be-spouse, you must break off with that person and honour God by ceasing from sin, or at least marry immediately which could also be dangerous.

    To separate sex from the act of procreation for which it wasintended is also a distortion and sinful, therefore to use condoms or other prophylactics is wrong, as is the sale of such devices, many of which are abortafactive, and many who do so (if they do so knowing that as such it has been condemned by established spiritual authority, such as certain catholics) offend God greatly and risk Hell through excommunication.
    God created all pleasures, and in themselves they are all good. However, if you are USING someone else to aquire pleasure for yourself this is wrong, and everyone knows this, for you put them beneath human dignity and treatthem as a mere animal.

    God forbids no one from marrying.

    To blame God for sin is upside down.
     
    Last edited: Sep 13, 2005
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. Nisus by peace he shall destroy many Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    470
    Lawdog, u Rock dawg
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. spidergoat pubic diorama Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    54,036
    So as long as you are giving your life to someone, and not just your penis, it's ok. (and God hates condoms (and fags))
     
  8. geeser Atheism:is non-prophet making Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,305
    how so, if your devout god fearing bible puncher, you must blame the one who, put sin there, but no you blame adam, cause you dont want to anger your god he may smite you.
    what a load of utter dogs testicals you people believe in.
     
  9. spidergoat pubic diorama Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    54,036
    In the days of the OT, sex usually resulted in pregnancy, and casual sex put a great burden on mothers to raise the kids (if they survived childbirth), or led to them killing the babies. Of course this is a problem, but circumstances have changed. I think the bible should be updated to account for the invention of birth control.
     
  10. Roman Banned Banned

    Messages:
    11,560
    That's exactly how I feel Rawdog! Except I get a real kick out of knowing I'm abusing the woman!
     
  11. spidergoat pubic diorama Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    54,036
    Sleeping around boosts evolution

    I guess God hates his own creation, or the passage about no premarital sex is the creation of some superstitious Jews. They don't even eat pork or shellfish for God's sake.
     
  12. Hapsburg Hellenistic polytheist Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,224
    Ah, I see that you are young, and have absolutely no experience in what you are talking about.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  13. stretched a junkie's broken promise Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,244
    Why do you think god made us horny?
     
  14. water the sea Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,442
    Do you think "god" "made" us?
    Do you believe in "god"?
     
  15. Roman Banned Banned

    Messages:
    11,560
    Water,

    I imagine you'd be the type to like it. But I might be wrong....
     
  16. water the sea Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,442
    You think wrong.
     
  17. anonymous2 Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    299
    Does God forbid someone from remarrying though, if the former spouse is still alive?

    Pre-marital sex is hate, but marital sex is love to you? If so, interesting division you got there, Lawdog.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!



    Also, if separating the act of sex from intending procreation is sin in your view, then why does the Catholic church allow the "calendar" method of birth control?

    And, concerning the aborifactive comment, doesn't "science" say that a certain percentage of fertilized eggs fail to attach to the uterine wall, regardless of the use of the "pill"? Was that part of God's wisdom to allow those deaths of what some Christians consider full human beings?
     
    Last edited: Sep 14, 2005
  18. Lawdog Digging up old bones Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,050
    Yes Jesus does very expressly forbid that, if fact, it appears that he condemns divorce mostly for the sake of preventing remarriage.
    Its not just me, but a doctrine all christians are obliged to adhere too.
    This method is allowed as long as its intended goal is not to prevent new life, not to stop God's action, for example, it might be used by those who wish to have period of abstinence for the sake of increased focus on prayer.
    Just as in, say still births or miscarriages, one cannot fully understand God's purpose, or know for certain that such a thing is God's purpose. There has always been debate amongtheologians as to when "ensoulment occurs", but it is alway best to err on the side of life.
     
  19. anonymous2 Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    299
    Ok, but what if a divorce is given, through no fault of one spouse, do you think that one shouldn't "blame God for sin" if that very spouse decides to marry again? One should be forced to be celibate for, in theory, 50+ years, or else one is sinning? In your view?

    All Christians are obliged to think of pre-marital sex as hate and marital sex as love?

    Your explanation of the "calendar method" doesn't make a lot of sense to me. Why would anyone use it at all, unless for the very purpose of preventing a pregnancy? Increased abstinence to focus on prayer? Then why would someone use the "calendar method", instead of picking any time for abstinence? Why would it just so happen to coincide with days it is most likely for a woman to become pregnant?
     
    Last edited: Sep 15, 2005
  20. Lawdog Digging up old bones Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,050
    The spouse that left, that pursued the divorce, is doing the wrong thing if it was a catholic marriage and he/she had a full understanding of marriage. Even so, my personal opinion is that non catholic christians and even pagans by nature marry for life, and that they should be held to this. Nevertheless, this is upheld for catholics and some christians, according to the vows and maturity of each individual case. It is not good that people have their spouses leave them, but they must try to fullfill their vow, for the sake of their own soul, with whatever grace God gives them, even if their aberrant spouse totally forgets them. this is for certain a hard teaching, and of course, would require much consideration. The Church is not as strict as it once was with annulments, for times have changed, and the Church must be just.
    in a sense yes, though one could say that circumstances could ameliorate the seriousness of the sin, such as drunkeness, or immaturity. Also, practical understanding of marriage suggests that sex is not always ideal or what one would hope as an expession of love, but God works even in this as a spiritual teacher.
    Abstnence is said to help focus on prayer for married couples, although I myself am not married, so here this is for discernment. I cannot answer fully what problems there are in why the Church has chosen this stance, and certainly, not all of the Church's teachings do I myself find easy or likeable, but I try to follow them as best I can, realizing that I am human and will screw up at times. The most difficult thing I have ever done is practice non-marital chastity. If one finds this impossible, one is free to marry.
     
  21. Asguard Kiss my dark side Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    23,049
    You do realise that just because the pope forbids the use of condoms doesnt mean that the priests and the sex ed teachers in catholic schools dissagree with there use dont you?

    i know this for a FACT because my mother IS a teacher in the catholic system and most catholics (even the priests) have been hoping that the church will change its offical position on contreception, not to help australia or the US, to help africa where they take the offical word to seriously
     
  22. Angelic Being Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    412
    It is a sin that can be forgiven - I mean I have indulged in sexual activities, but I dont crave or yearn for sex now. I have asked for forgiveness and it has been granted to me. Now I shall remain a 'CLEAN until I get married to my Love.

    Thank You.
     
  23. PsychoticEpisode It is very dry in here today Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,452
    Is abstaining from sex considered a waste of good sperm or eggs? Why no sin for celibacy? Probably because its no fun and it feels good which is taboo in religious circles.
     

Share This Page