An electro tracker injected into the flesh would be just as noticeable because now there would be a female wearing a condom armed with a needle to puncture the flesh and install some sort of miniscule chip. A good idea for an Africa with a stable government in like... 6000 years. Because you know all those African females are just rolling in money to invest in overly thought out condoms. How about a police force? Or some sex education first? And yes DNA forensics are available but the idea is to PREVENT the rape from happening. I think Africa needs streetlamps- so when I am walking my goats back from market I feel safe.
I know super, what i was trying to point out was an equivlant to the anti rape condom and i didnt mean something huge i ment something REALLY small but i surpose it wouldnt work because the penis is shooting out and you want to shoot something in. Seriously tho what about martial arts training, a less courpt police and MORE police and street lights as you said
quote the article (that you've read, yes?); "Police statistics show more than 50,000 rapes are reported every year, while experts say the real figure could be four times that as they say most rapes of acquaintances or children are never reported." I couldn't find stats for South Africa easily, so used US stats as a guide instead. So I'm guessing they are broadly similar, backed up by that very article, so my points stand. These things are inciting paranoia, and profiteering from it, and will do little to prevent crime. In fact nothing, because my other point still stands, which you didn't pick up on. In the minority of cases where the assailant is a stranger, the victim has been stalked, assaulted, and been penetrated before this device comes into play. So what do they prevent?
My point is that women can't/won't wear one all the time, because of expense, discomfort, menstrual cycles, and risk of toxic shock syndrome (not discussed in the article). As people cannot predict when they will be raped, and as more often than not it is perpetrated by someone you know, and trust, are victims likely to be wearing one at the right time? Probably not.
A little known technique, taught to me by an old master in the woods, is that one should attempt to direct the intruding device into the backpassage - where a very tight squeeze and a sharp thrust to the left or right could sheer the offending penis right out of its socket! lol Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
Men will likely assume that a woman is not wearing this device. They could also find a way of removing the condom without surgery. phlogistician, I think you were the first one to mention that this can be uncomfortable and even dangerous to wear for the woman. I think that the idea of this anti-rapre device has some merit but it will not work in practive unless all women wear it and men are aware of that. Perhaps the money spent on inventing these contraptions should be spent on education and security to prevent rape and the spread of AIDS.
Why not have women with guns in their vaginas? Then they just clench the right muscles while a penis is in there, and KABOOM, they blow the guy in half, right at the crotch. She'd just have to position themselves right– lie back for the attacker and spread her legs. Then have like a 12 gauge slug go tearing through his penis right through his midsection. That'd be pretty cool.
I think that it is a good thought, but realistically would never work. Women would probably have to change it, let's say every 6 hours...4 times a day, 28 of these things a week...way too tedious. And if women did forget about it...woooo what a nasty surprise.
I disagree, if all men are aware of the device then they will sureley remove it before raping the woman Rather than for the prevention of rape i believe that the device is to catch the rapist afterwards
It is designed for both purposes. There are more cons than pros associated with this condom. I can't see it in widespread use.
