Iran a few points to consider before invading

Its only a matter of time before the USA and the UK find an excuse to invade Iran and its odds on to be about WMD's.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

This time though I hope they use WMDs in defense.

Saddam was a Coward He should have Nuked them, instead he hid all his WMDs, what a fool.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

um, i hope they dont use WMD's cuz then we'll all die.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Hey chill, we all die someday or the other, only in this case though U wont die alone, there will be 6 Billion others to accomodate with U. Better die together instead of alone, look at the bright side of it, there will be no more wars.

 

it's about people (one person in this case((who just happens to look like Charles Manson)) producing nukes and GIVING\SELLING them to criminals.

watch some Batman movies, then youll understand.

 

As distasteful as it is, I don't think there is any alternative but letting Iran go ahead with developing their atomic weapons program. (Face it, Brian, that's what they really want)

They know that if the US invades another soveriegn (largely) muslim nation, the gates of hell will be officially open.

 

Iran's pissing off a lot of different countries right now. If war or bombing becomes the only option, then the US won't be going at it alone.

 

Neither will Iran. They're already compiling a list of formidable allies who back them up if it came down to war, although the question of whether they will be supplying soldiers, supplies, or even it being a proxy war is still too far in the future to tell.

AmishRakeFight

 

lets see 70+ years of heavy dependance on oil, untold billions shelled out for this poison fluid and where has this money gone????

hmmmmm elevate the people? advance humanity? build infrastructure, feed starving children? education?

well i can see why people are pissed off, but pissed at who?

 

They have meticulously manipulated USA so that they can shooo off UN inspectors and start building theirs defense systems.

Hats off to them, Justice has happened with use of wits.

 

Yeah you think so !

Translation: The British people won't buy another used war from America .

 

Who said this?

Also, please explain how the VVER-1000 reactor is NOT a breeder for plutonium. Using technical details, physical principles and related calculations of course.

Edit: For those of you hammering out "invasion", stop it. US military action against Iran, if such a thing were to ever happen, would consist of nothing more than a few airstrikes and cruise missile attacks. That is all that would be necessary to utterly obliterate their hopes of a weapons program. This could be done quite easily over the course of several hours. All the teeth-gnashing about an invasion is pointless.

 

go ahead and ruin brian's fantasy.

 

And if/when Iran retaliates against those airstrikes of ours with our soldiers next door in Iraq..?

- N

 

You have posed a question to me I answered it , and now you are going off into some ridiculous tangent . I have not a clue as to what you are trying to accomlish here .

 

Then we help defend Iraq?

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

I want you to explain why the reactor Iran is building is NOT diagnostic of intent to produce fuel for weapons.

 

I am not a nuclear physicist and if you are trying to make a point could you for fuck’s sake get to it !

Or better yet if you are trying to infer Iran is capable of attaining a nuclear weapon , then please show me the industrial/technological applications that Iran’s industrial complex possesses that would enable Iran to actually construct a nuclear bomb . I would be most interested to hear from you about this as the Americans , Europeans and Russians are in agreement that Iran does not possess the necessary industrial applications to build one .

 

So if Iran invades Iraq due to our airstrikes, you think we'll just sit back and play defense in Iraq instead of invading Iran at the same time?

If we're gonna go through all that trouble of having another Iran-Iraq war, we may as well gain more ground and invade the SOBs while we're at it.

Let's just hope another "Gulf War Syndrome" isn't created from it with our use of new weaponry (mini-nukes) while our soldiers march over the new Iranian golf course as what happened in the first Gulf War.

- N

 

Fine. I'll just re-post what I've posted here before, and see what nuanced insight and expert technical commentary you can offer.

I think this scenario is wildly implausible to begin with, but do you mean a full-scale landed invasion with a subsequent occupation a la what happened in Iraq? If so then no, there would be no reason to, and even if there was, we don't have the manpower resources for such a venture.

Also, you're a bit off the mark with the so-called "Mini Nukes" and GWS, FYI.

 

Likewise I will repost what I wrote earlier .

Now as I asked earlier .

Simple enough ?