We have already agreed to use the merriam-websters definition of freewill and as I've pointed out it's incompatible with ourselves Viz. we do not fit...
Perhaps governed wasn't the right word. At least I admit my errors. You still have to concede several points and accept that you were wrong on many...
I need not tell you every factor for your idea of freewill is that freewill is not governed. But it is governed for 1 by emotion. That is not to...
Actually they are... I don't see how me making a threat of reporting you as a troll is incompatible with incompatibalism. Again my making that threat...
I like that first statement... I'm thinking the very same thing and only in death will I be free.
You are just experiencing. I'm not saying you aren't making a decision you idiot. I am saying your decision isn't of its own freewill and is governed...
His idiocy shows again. I don't know and I don't think anyone would consider that proper argumentation. If you can reread the thread without thinking...
Oh god you are still coming back for more? You couldn't have made a different decision. Because there were factors present which made it so you made...
In that case, I have wasted my time trying to educate you guys. I have showed you using the merriam websters definition of freewill that it...
Anyone with any idea of argumentation who disagreed with me would have approached this properly.
Alright let me be more precise when I said this. "Because as I already pointed out I know what composes this concept. And if what composes this...
What are you talking about? What have you thought of already? You aren't more intelligent than me you haven't even refuted anything I have stated...
Why are you guys trolling the philosophy section? This is completely uncalled for. Philosophy is about argument... making claims and going on to...
Because as I already pointed out I know what composes this concept. And if what composes this concept isn't reality than neither is freewill. You...
You are an idiot. That is not a proof, or at least a logical proof. That is what you think an evidence. But it's not. From your own definition......
Alright I apologize Chimpkin, it was uncalled for, but I don't apologize for the other times.
I already showed you verbally, I didn't show you visually though I can. And what conception are you referring to? Also you are using odd words......
Bahaha... Objectivism. On what do you base your morals Viz why is it you have the morals that you have again?
Chimpkin, you are an idiot. Let me tell you what else I'm claiming... a complete conception of freewill is impossible. And I will explain how. But I...
Separate names with a comma.
