It's true by definition. In classical mechanics, a force acting on a particle is defined by F=dp/dt, where p is the momentum of the particle.
Since p=mv, we have F=d(mv)/dt=(dm/dt)*v + m*(dv/dt)={if mass is constant}=ma
Yordas comment is completely wrong. Don't mind it.
Roughly, the positive or negative charge of an atom depends on the ratio protons/electrons. If the atom has more electrons bound than there are protons in the nucleus it is a negative ion, and if the atom has more protons in the nucleus than...
Not true. A rational number can be written p/q where p and q are integers.
I wonder how you can claim mathematics is inconsistent, and keep a straight face, when you appearantly have a rather incomplete knowledge of it.
Seems to me like you decided that standard mathematics was inconsistent, and then went to find where it was. You have made up your mind yet have not produced a rigorous proof of your claims.
If and only if the decimal representation is not cyclic.
No infinite summations can be irrational. Most of them are not cyclic, which means that they can't be written as p/q.
I think it is you who are confused.
I'm trying my best do decipher your statements!
Ok that can absolutely happen! But you are making statements that need rigorous mathematical treatment.
Very good. Then it can be dealt with properly!
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.