Search results

Is 'A' a Contradiction? Fifteen Key Methodological Principles for Successful Exegesis: [1] Assume the Biblical Works are not Like other similar Ancient Works Which All contain Errors (e.g. Josephus). Also assume your Holy Book is true while other holy books are false and apply...

Neither one of those instances show that. Even heterosexuals can be open to homosexuality. You seemed to have missed the purpose of section three which argues that Jesus usurped all manner of traditional values and goes from there. A quotation: I suggest actually reading the article...

"""""the artilce keeps saying that since the Bible says he was not hetro therefore he must be homo. """""""" You are OFFICIALLY challenged to show where this pheonomeon occurs throughout the article. Vinnie

Who? I'm not the one that fell for an OBVIOUS parody. Did you see my statement? Nature is red in tooth and claw. God is good. LOL. IG is virtually antithetical to conservative xianity and the Garden story and God's "pre-sin" earth. It could fit some liberal forms but still, come on...

I stopped in because I was told a bunch of skeptics actually fell for one of Winace's parodies. As I am in the business of parody writing myself, I had to come play along :D :D I'll have to re-bookmark this page. Vinnie

That passage is in Mark 14:51-52 right after Jesus is arrested in Gethseman. It was argued that it ultimately came from the text of Secret Mark which canonical Mark redacted and covered up. A snippet from section 6 of the article Notice that the youth wears only a linene cloth over his...

Awe, you shouldn't have told them it was a parody. I was having too much fun playing an ID yec, keeping the spoof alive. It is rather highly amusing that some actually fell for Winace's wonderful parody.Kudos to Winace. Vinnie

Repo Man made these comments: 1. Theists are not searching for truth. 2. I have no doubt that the universe was not created for the benefit of humans. If both of those statements are true then you must be a theist. Vinnie

atheroy, if winace's article is so ridiculous, how come neither you or anyone here can refute it, but only offer insults, assertions and ad hominems against it? Vinnie

"""""""Once you accept the idea that god and satan have planted false fossils to deceive us, what is stopping them from having created the world a millisecond ago, with all of us in our present state, brains full of false memories? """""" The Bible doesn't record it. There is a difference...

""""Richard Dawkins, Oxford University Professor of Zoology by day, godless communist sympathizer by night"""""""" This is hardly an attack. Dawkings is renown for his disdain, contemp and utter hatred for religious things. Unfortunately, Winace makes an error as Ken Miller is a Christian...

This is what the more philosophical concept of intelligent design teaches. In a theistic universe the probability for life is 1 since a God of love would want to create sentient beings with volution. In an atheistic universe the probability is much much lower. We are here, theefore, there is...

What are you talking about? Satan is the great deceiver. He deceived Adam and Eve. He tried to deceive Jesus and is described as a roaring lion waiting to devour prey in the bible. Of course Satan would have planted seeds of doubt to trick us about the veracity of God's word. The rest is our...

This article argues Jesus was gay? What do you think? http://www.after-hourz.net/ri/wasjesusgay.html Vinnie

Excellent article Mr. Winace. Nature is red in tooth and claw. God is good! Just like the water cycle, the food cycle could not have developed by chance. Many people think that water rises, condenses and it rains. This is too simplistic. The real reason for precipitation is the bergeron...

Hot off the press! http://www.acfaith.com/penal.html Here I point out ten difficulties with the most popular Western understanding of Jesus' death on the cross. Instead of making evident the significance of Jesus' death on the cross, the PS model of atonement raises insurmountable...

What rule book? Obviously, the one asking the question is going to imply something from a yes answer. I want to know what the yes answer is. Vinnie

Christian posits free will and says humans are directly responsible for most human sufferning. Argument ensues. Why don't we skip that and get into the real question, forget moral ethical evil which is caused by personal free agents, lets focus on natural evil. It cannot be attributed to some...

And if God was? Vinnie

Integrating Theology and Science Vinnie