Oh i know quite alot about the anler fish and i also happen to know that it poses another coevolutionary problem. i was addressing taht fact...
So by saying EVERTHING accept organs fitting, then that makes it plausible? i think not..and its doestn stop the fact that indeed such complimentary...
and veins? muscles, tendons, lymph system, nerves too? if you think stating a fact is trolling then indeed i am trolling, oh please , you...
and i suppose the requisite brain functions co evolved with this? can such a mutation causign uv vision happenin one go? and if not, can we simply...
is this supposed to prove something? i like how you only addressed the heart there, very nice..avoided the important issues.. wow, you truly...
so they evovled it becuase it was helpfull? i thought it would be the other way around? well, considering you said it was quite subjective i dont...
First off, im sure those hox genes dont control tightness of legs, size of heart and everthign else ive mentioned let alone the co ordination of...
Yes, and there have been many stupid compromises. "Compromise" itself is not intelligent or dumb. unless of course the compromise is intelligent...
when i refert to coevolution i mean parts of a body, or of speices taht smply had to "keep up" in terms of evolution or else there would be no animal...
my term refers to the coevolution of parts in either single species or in both sexes or in a symbiotic or predator prey relationship. your right...
what exactly are you talking about? indeed there ARE many instances where features that are separated did have to(by evolutionary thoery) coevolve,...
again i have invoke not diety nor do i harbour a belief in one. Does that mean i cant suspect design?
first off can you provide me with evidence that any mutation taht makes the spinal column longer also make the nerve because that certainly would be...
i think though that its about more then "filling in the gaps", i think we should reevaluate the mechanissm invoked when we look at adaptions. I...
you mean thats what you assume happened. I personally dont know what happened, what i can say is, the girrafe clearly evolved. "But I think that...
You are living in a dreamworld man, if you truly believe that the nerve HAD to keep up then you need to go back to the drawing board on evolution,...
yes it is a fact that the nerve is there, not that it is "wired incorectly", that is presupposition and incredulity, again i refer to the appendix,...
"there is no reason"? again all you are doing is arguign from incredulity, I dont know what its function could be, therefore ill presuem it has none...
Separate names with a comma.