Search results

Greater Syria doesn't exist.

This entire thread is festering with stupidity.

wow madanthonywayne... 4,000 posts later and you're still an idiot. Shaman what's the point of debating anything when you're always on the defence, you fall back to the "well that's the accepted theory (the usual 9/11 explanation)" so there's no need for you to prove anything. Can you prove to...

yeah the fact that 2 steel buildings collapsed on one day due to fire and structural damage. the conspiracy arises from their perfect fall. the fact that one building fell almost entirely due to fire, with an unknown amount of physical damage. once again a perfect fall. the fact that on...

wow you people know less and less as time goes on. I have almost no words, except that you're a moron and the sooner you stop talking in this thread the better it is for everybody. There are many, many NGOs within the united states... the fact that you don't even recognize that is pretty...

ummmm.... the government has an incomplete list of physical evidence (largely untested at that, for thermate and other residual compounds. being explained as unnecessary) that was quickly shipped out of country. also this "physical evidence" could really be anything since no outside source...

But you're not really posting many resources. The problem I see is that we are posting many links and such, whereas you said "I don't know.. maybe" or "Yeah, I don't think that could happen". And Buffalo roam keeps posting government sources... which don't offer much insight, since it is...

We should probably take this one step at a time anyways... so I would say we should discuss the first thing that could have possibly occured in wtc 7; the morning before people showed up for work and the fires began. or whatever somebody else brings up, but i think we can cover things alot...

I can only talk to so many people at a time i must have missed it, i don't deliberately avoid posts..

you're an idiot if you think an isolated incident offers global explanation.

Okay thermite is not a "bomb"... semantics, i still don't see your point? There were none because somebody would have noticed it? The building was actually empty the entire morning and afternoon of 9/11 because of those random fires; obviously an attempt to keep people from entering. So in...

go troll elsewhere or find a girlfriend, seriously.

oh... you mean this side?

where is the massive damage? even in the wtc 7 collapse videos, there is no visible damage to anything, it's just a building falling down. what the hell are you talking about? firefighters do not stay away from steel framed buildings under suspicion that they will collapse ask anyone. and...

you know, if you actually spend some time to find pictures of wtc 7...

And what about the molten metal after the clean up? *note fire does not melt metal

Okay rubble hit WTC 7? Your point? That by some godlike coincidence the building implodes from top down? And if that was the case why didn't the verizon or us post office building collapse? And yeah you are actually being difficult regarding the madrid tower. I brought it up because it...

Yes... actually there was a third building that collapsed. Unsurprisingly many didn't even know this happened due to a media blackout. I learned about this a week after 9/11 so that's why I'm on the skeptical side of things. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oEoKhyXKWxQ&mode=related&search= Here...

I'm afraid to say that won't do as far as the truth is concerned. We all thank god that it wasn't any worse than it really was. But Dunn did you know about the third building, the specific one we are discussing right now?

no the third building at the WTC that collapsed... after the towers. the one the media wasnt allowed to talk about. I cannot see how this does not prove that something is amiss in the whole scandal.