the crux of the issue, as i see it, is the question of whether human functioning;- *intelligence* (hopefully), follows formal, if as-yet...
yeah. good point, but the trouble is, free will?
yellow threads, dusted with...
dude; it doesn't matter. keep on developing your ideas and sharing them. noone can be more rigorous with your work than you. Just...
good gracious! what is this about? lets not lose our locatedness, here: we're here to discuss the issue-substances, not to 'argue' with one...
macm, i think your point is a valuable one, but rather than asserting the 'refutation of srt,' why not concentrate on its...
i feel that this thread has wandered, so i re-raise the issue of 'rleativity of simultaneity,' as i believe i've heard james r refer to. this topic...
one of the coolest definitions of life comes from maturana and varela; autopoiesis ~mind as organizing principle! it's like an ultimate...
darkman, i like how you say that 'god is responsable for humans, but a higher power is responsable for life' ~extraterrestrials? i dunno, but we...
alright; to create an 'intelligent' -i.e. pattern-discerning -machine, we are gonna need to basically reverse-engineer the human soul ~yeah?...
interesting theory xgen. could you explain again how an entity/object's existence in this quantumized absolute spacetime is somehow inherently...
Hey. Check this out first: it's important not to let these discussions degenerate into fights.. we don't even know each other! in the absence of...
but check it out: "A point in space-time has a unique set of coordinates which, by the definition, has zero extension along any of the four...
"Thunder and lightning, different manifestations of the same event." nicely put quark, but lemme ask; thunder results from lightning, don;t it?...
from quark: "A point in space-time is an event." yeah. but an event has to have a duration, so there wouldn't really be any such thing as...
p.s. for an example of an interesting 'hole' in the s/g rt paradigm, check out the thread on 'the death of relativity' ~
see here, the trouble with formalism -mathematical logics- is that the scope of information is beyond the breadth of conscious/simultaneous...
alright guys!! excellent wordthoughts, and many thanks of appreciation from here. tinq, funk, hold up now.. lets take a substantive look at this...
Separate names with a comma.