On the flip side, of all this nonsense, Hawking and Susskind took a completely different direction with relativity. They go as far to say that an...
The only thing I agree with from Taylor and Wheeler is that interpretations of GR may have been in error when saying that an object could measure or...
I think saying that something is a wormhole implies that it has a naked singularity or open singularity (two phrases meaning the same thing), but if...
I see no reason to discuss anything with you beyond this point, because this is reaching a whole new level of ignorance. I guess this proves that it...
A wormhole would have a naked singularity, so it would allow someone to see it. A wormhole doesn't have an event horizon.
It is only very speculative to people that speculate about space not actually having curvature. Light has no mass, so the effect of gravitational...
A black hole and a wormhole could have the same gravitational affects on its surroundings. It is the gravitational field in the center that...
Galileo proved there was no preferred frame of reference while on a boat, when an object fell straight down even though the boat was moving. If...
Couldn't help but wonder how it is even possible that you would say this about what I said... There was no need to state that something had rest...
The reason people "should" use the term rest-mass is to distinguish it from a situation where it would have a relativistic mass due to its velocity,...
That is what the wiki said, and that is partly why I was saying that the mass of the photon was E = pc and not m = h/λc. That is the whole argument...
I think the error in this kind of derivation is that you guys are assuming that particles with mass are a wave. By substituting energy with a wave...
So all that time I said a photon could have little or no mass, you believed that the photon has a mass of {h}/{λc}? {h}/{λc} is not equal to zero....
To help clear things up with exchemist, do you know that the photon has a relativistic mass which has been defined as m = h/λc, like the OP's proof...
I don't see how your opinion could mean anything really when you don't even know what we are even talking about, other than you seem to trust...
I think you are confused, because this whole thread is just a bunch of complete nonsense. I think exchemist just realized that the OP derived a new...
I couldn't help but notice that the relativistic mass that you called m_r is equal to p/c, so m_r = p/c. Then if you assume that m_r = p/c, then p =...
No, I got the relation m = h/λc from the original post, which was the whole thing I was arguing against... That was the final answer that Ultron got...
It seems like the equation m = h/λc could only be muddled around with, as you say. If it cannot be used as the mass in E = mc^2, then what mass...
I am just trying to assume that everything you are saying is true and then trying to apply it, like you wanted me too. Feel free to tell me what I...
Separate names with a comma.