Reality is unknowable and science can't touch it, it can only describe the world and it's behavior as it appears. The true, and ultimate nature of...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ssf7P-Sgcrk https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Rz4ReNv6M8
It's not narcissism if you recognize it to be true of everyone else as well.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qJHTZ7GWL4o https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fcPWU59Luoc
It's very taboo in the West to say who we really are.
Saving time to discuss with your psychiatrist your belief that inanimate things can move on their own, are you? :D
The intelligence man used to go to the moon is a reflection of natural laws. Did you think we got there by magic? Understanding or intelligence is...
I know. It was a Socratic question.
If gravity stops acting on things at rest, why do things at rest still have weight?
If an object appeared on earth that could move on it's own and produce higly complex mathematical patterns, we would say it was alien intelligence,...
The computer didn't build and program itself in a vacuum though, the universe did. And the computer can't produce patterns so complex that they are...
It really is a matter of scale. If we look at the universe as a whole, we see this vast, interconnected thing which is moving on it's own and...
I don't know how much clearer he can be than saying there is no detachment between matter and space, and they are continuous. He also wrote about the...
If something is one piece, it's whole. Whole doesn't just mean all of. It might appear separate, but the rock and the space it occupies are...
And if it's ludicrous to assert the universe doesn't contain parts, then Einstein and his theory of GR is ludicrous, as is string theory. You're cell...
If they don't contain parts, then they are what..? If parts exist in the objective world, you should have no problem producing a part with an...
Until we get to quarks, then you're not sure if they contain parts....
Exactly, there are only parts by definition. Parts are defined, and thus created, by our perception and language, and they have no objective...
Now that we've established you have no reason to believe that a whole can't necessarily exist without parts, let's get back to discussing whether or...
Very well, but if you don't know, you shouldn't have said that all wholes contain parts.
Separate names with a comma.
