Search results

  1. S

    Solar Cycle cause

    Mercury to the rescue.
  2. S

    Theory of Everything

    Time will tell, I guess :)
  3. S

    Theory of Everything

    I've been the target of trolls since the day I started this thread, it is not easy to keep one's temper. Sorry to offend you, mate, it's been good chatting. How would you respond to people who continuously bash your work while not even reading it? It's rude and disrespectful, and I am not...
  4. S

    Theory of Everything

    I've tried, I emailed a bunch once I started the website so I am waiting to see if anyone bothers to look into it. Unfortunately I am not a student so I don't have any help from a professor etc.
  5. S

    Theory of Everything

    K. Later bro.
  6. S

    Theory of Everything

    WOWWWW I'm so done talking to you. Your OPINIONS are in no way a scientific rebuttal, and you champion ignorance like no other. G'luck accepting your fallacies when you have to face them.
  7. S

    Gnosticism

    Ha, sounds good. Thanks!
  8. S

    Theory of Everything

    Not by a galaxy but by a galaxy of galaxies. Please explain why not; remember, all things are relative. Further, please see Figure 4 of my paper and the discussion thereof (section 3.2) www.cascadinguniverse.org for evidence of the flow I describe, along with the rest of the evidence that...
  9. S

    Theory of Everything

    On a smaller scale. Remember the Great Attractor is basically a super SUPER massive black hole that lenses ALL light we observe to a degree. It would not appear so simply, however if you look at Figure 5 you will see multiple Einstein crosses, as I describe. You are not arguing this fact...
  10. S

    Theory of Everything

    It works generally as that says but it ALSO occurs due to the Great Attractor as I say (by the same mechanism just on a much larger scale). Dispute the evidence of Figure 5 in my paper?
  11. S

    Theory of Everything

    www.cascadinguniverse.org. Please tell me how the evidence does not support it if you are going to call me a crank and claim it violates "a lot of physical principles."
  12. S

    Theory of Everything

    Yeah I posted those things in post 78. ;-D https://vimeo.com/64868713
  13. S

    Theory of Everything

    So let's see. You dismiss my evidence while once more not bothering to look at it. See a pattern here? Einstein cross is NOT "simply light from a distant QUASAR" that has been lensed and bent around "an intervening galaxy". That is horribly naive. It is, instead, SIMPLY LIGHT LENSED BY...
  14. S

    Theory of Everything

    I'm glad you bring up the Einstein Cross (proving you didn't bother to look at my evidence). Look at Figure 5(c) (and 5(a) and 5(b) so you can understand the overall shape) of my paper and tell me how that isn't precisely a moving Einstein cross as a result of many galaxies being affected by...
  15. S

    Theory of Everything

    Filaments in the least. Shapley supercluster appears to be another Great Attractor since it has signs of gravity holding it together. I don't care what you think about that answer, but that is the answer for anyone who stumbles on this and is wondering.
  16. S

    Theory of Everything

    Filaments, gravitationally bounded superclusters such as the Great Attractor and perhaps the Shapley Superclusters are instead the next levels up.
  17. S

    Theory of Everything

    Evidence is my main reason. Section 3. Do you see an actual problem with section 3 that you can point to? Because it is EVIDENCE, which is what would need disproved. I am just telling you what the evidence tells me.
  18. S

    Theory of Everything

    The Great Attractor is the center of mass of the system as evidenced in section 3. Anything beyond about 150 million light years begins to enter into this electromagnetic field "loop". All large-scale superclusters are the result of extreme gravitational lensing. The lensing causes clusters...
  19. S

    Theory of Everything

    Definitely should consider the center of mass! Though as the object gets bigger, the more spread apart its particles are (atoms on Earth are alike to galaxies on the Great Attractor) so its tougher for us to see structure, on top of the gravitational lensing effects that cause the observation...
  20. S

    Theory of Everything

    After reading your Eternal Intent essay, I think we have very similar ideas. I think we can look at the universe as EITHER exclusively "waves" OR exclusively "particles", they are precisely the same idea though. I say particles in my paper because we SEE particles (planets, stars, black holes...
Back
Top