Search results

This possibility does not falify your faith based believe - only shows your support for it with known scientific facts is illogical as there are alternatives to your postulated IDer, which you ignore. Such as? If the giraffe was "designed" the designer is unbelievably STUPID, not intelligent...

I think now I know why she is "ex wife"

For someone who may claim to being smart, the latitude you are willing to give to chance appears to be as exceeding that can be accommodated by logical analysis of phenomena. So, all you are doing is suppressing your power of deduction in order to deny the obvious. Its like standing with a...

Scientific knowledge simply does not logically lead to the valid and sound inference of an IDer. It can not lead to any inference that is unfalsifiable, unless you use fallacious reasoning or introduce unwarranted assumptions that are unsupported by science. And it's not a truce... it's simply...

Don't confuse me being stubborn with you simply being wrong. You stubbornly want to defend your believe in non-existence of an Intelligent Designer. Period. And you are using science to argue your case. I too, am using the same science to claims that Scientific knowledge leads to the...

Again I ask, where do you personally draw the line between science and philosophy? Personally? Well, my view of knowledge is that its differentiated, but not necessarily separated. I would like to differentiate Science and Philosophy, but separate them? Why ? Physics, is not mathematics, yet...

I know you would want to have an exclusive treatment of science, but I differ.

And how is my reflection evidence of ID as opposed to simply a non-intelligent mechanical process such as evolution? If that is the best evidence you have to put forward, such that nothing else will convince me, then you have nothing other than your belief and your desire to have your questions...

Failure..........what failure? Reality is perceived subjectively and relatively But that does not mean its so. Of course you are entailed to hold it anyway you want, and claim my view are "irrelevant, and unwarranted" In the Dream World, I guess they are..............keep dreaming.

A fan of football at least knows the rules if they are to speak meaningfully about the game. They are not always agreeable, and you have decided to remain disagreeable.

We don't follow Aristotle and Plato and Socrates around until we find a mistake or some ambiguous wording, and then declare our interpretation of it to be scientific evidence for anything. Why do you abuse the memory and reputation of Einstein in that manner? I think you can say its because I...

That is quite poetic, but not too illustrative to me. What does that mean? “Every action, has an equal and opposite reaction” Science “You reap, what you sow” Philosophy different words, same thing: different knowledge, same advise - I don't aim for a distinction in order to say you...

Which you are keeping secret for some reason. Why is that? The evidence here is that you have not even bothered to acquire a basic understanding of Darwinian evolution. You keep making simple mistakes. Well, if you have realized, the World, is a kind of a Matrix and Mirror Mazes. We are all...

Please post the "irrefutable evidence of Intelligent Design" and we will happily show you why it can (and should) be refuted. Well, I think I have pretty much tried to give you, but so far you have decided to refute it. Therefore I will give you one more example. You can choose to refute it...

The question i have for bigfoot is, where does philosophy (a descriptive world of unverifiable ideas) fit into your worldview? It seems you have just as much of a problem with accepting things as unverifiable as those types of people who misunderstand the boundaries of science, and think it can...

“Why would you accept his position and not the plethora of eminent scientists who do not believe in God, and certainly not in Intelligent Design?” One, is because I have researched and found irrefutable evidence of Intelligence Design. Two, there may be as many, (if not more) scientists who...

First, appeals to authority and/or celebrity aren't too compelling. Second, one man's opinion does not make it fact. Third, even ignoring the accuracy of your interpretation of what Einstein wrote, it would still not be an "admission of Intelligent Design" but an admission that he believed there...

Okay, I got you wrong first, on "Highest Order" But tell me this, what does this statement means attributed to Einstein? I think it is an admission of Intelligent Design by the father of Relativity. “I am not an atheist,” he began. “The problem involved is too vast for our limited minds. We...

Yeah, you could say that...........never heard of that one.

Maltese