The transition from classical physics to modern and correct quantum physics was difficult because - the gravity was experimentally not sufficiently...
A very intelligent question! Kristoffer Giant Hyrax Male, 36, from Denmark Ah, that explains it. Just shocked to see a guy from Utah having a sense...
The Lagrange formalism can be used also for non-closed and non-conservative physical systems and the Hamilton principle leads to the equation of...
The Atomistic Theory of Matter is also a quantum field theory but with quantized sources of the field. If you want to make correct quantum mechanics...
And everyone can read www.atomsz.com again ban and censorship!
You mean, the censorship as banned member? The main cause of problems are solutions.
From your profile: Kristoffer Stop proselytizing I never leave physics.
You can find the answers to almost all your questions in www.atomsz.com with all the predictions and experimental verifications. The energy is not...
You can look, but most probable you cannot read and understand the sentences. Congratulation, you are a famous scientist. origin It keeps getting...
And, of course, four stable particles with two kinds of elementary Maxwell charges and two continuous fundamental fields are needed.
For the description of Nature, there are only few natural constants needed: c, e, me, mP, g. The Lagrange multipliers such as h, h0 =h/387.7 are...
Of course, the ATOMISTIC THEORY OF MATTER IS THE DESCRIPTION OF THE ULTIMATE TRUTH OF NATURE! Without any other options!!!
NATURE IS OBVIOUSLY ATOMISTIC is the ultimate truth!!
… AND NATURE IS OBVIOUSLY ATOMISTIC!!!!!
I don’t want to hold valid any bad theoretical physical concepts, I want describe Nature such as it is!
Fundamental Principles in Physics 31.08.2015 To describe Nature the following principles are sufficient and necessary: Fundamental Principles are...
I leave the forum but I'm never leaving the physics.
The "scientific community" tried the description of Nature with the energetic concept and did not work. The atomistic theory has solved the central...
I have documented the whole thread for posterity as communication with a part of the "scientific community". Bye, bye..
The energetic conventionalism is disastrous and does not have scientific future.
Separate names with a comma.
