Search results

They knew plants really well. And ship building. And tower building. And war ;) Agree. Depends what we are talking about I suppose.

Yes, yes we do. Amazingly, many feel they fit perfectly into biblical chronology. But that’s whole other topic.

Has science answered, we know how life began, or to they beleive they think they have the answer? What about the stuff that is? Do you mean to say no ancient literature gives us an accurate account of events? None?

Generally speaking, I concur. The ancients view on reality is probably better than ours, as, they were closer to the beginning than us. That has to speak for something. We writedown what we know and see, why wouldn’t they? Just because they were long ago, does not negate some of their...

Laser eyes maybe ;) Probably, but none of the big questions. Open for examples.

Yes, the sun came later. We must leave room for the supernatural, while at the same time, giving assumptions and man-made ideas lessor weight then they possibly deserve. I don’t see it as that, many don’t. Even many scientists. We have allot of assumptions truth be told. Well, that kind of...

Ok, so what? We can infer based on what it says and then see what actually happens. We see micro, not macro. Put 2&2 together, there it is.

lol. Ok I will.

Indeed. Agree. I don’t. Different time, different perspetive. Literary devices need to factor in to imo. The Bible is not a detailed science book, agree, it’s a history book ( how God dealt with those before us ) and a instruction manual how to live and to prepare our deaths. Lots in...

I will have a look. It’s not dishonest, that’s a unreasonable statement. It’s a reasonable conclusion if Genesis is the truth. God creates base kinds, they reproduce and drift/adapt to stressors after their kind. Cats stay cats and dogs stay dogs but with a wide margin for change.

Could you show me a link to a completely different creature turning into another ? Again, that is not what we would "expect to see" from reading Genesis. I respectively disagree. It’s exactly what we would expect to see.

But it does follow. Look as what we see. Creatures reproducing after their established kind. We never see creatures change into a completly different creature, but see see slow drift and expansion of the species over time.

Genesis showed created kinds of creatures, reproducing after kind, exactly what we see. Micro EV, not macro. We see micro all the time, exactly as expected. Evolutions today have confused ( or assumed ) macro in face of micro. Depending on environment, food, ( Darwin’s finches ) stressors...

Agree, not that issue. I am talking about others things, like the religiosity of mankind. One would expect to see this is Genesis were true. Since Adam and Eve, they would have passed down all they knew, but due to rebellion/sin/disbelief, we are left with the left-overs of millennia of...

Plants can live for quite some time without sunlight, I am a amature botanist, 24 hours is nothing to a plant. This was a one time event, long over.

It was only 24 hours, ( day 3 for plants and day4 for sun ) not long time; plants would have lived in that short period and people were not even around then so they would not have see this issue.

For some I suppose. Never gets old for me. We can still figure out it’s mysteries and complexities. He did create a fully functioning running Creation. Lots to know and do. We still have some animals to name;)

Not necessarily. But I hear what your saying. Always keeping an eye for the super in amongst the natural, ( as long as your know it’s possible ) makes for an interesting life.

Agree, question is why? Based on reality or based purely in the minds of men? This God complex of humanity is quite strong and prevalent from our earliest records, why? I think because he’s actually there calling all men from all times but that me.

Unless god himself sustained them. The supernatural cannot be ignored within the paradigm. It’s part and parcel.