Okay, I read all that. We're going in circles now so time to summarize. I'm not convinced that my paper is wrong by your argument that GR is valid,...
Those can be refuted (proven invalid) logically. I refuted not a scientific model or theory but a claim that we know that black holes exist.
We do have evidence that suggests an alternative. It's in my paper. True. Nevertheless my paper shows that GR is invalid. My paper shows an...
The alteration to the BB could be something that doesn't affect agreement with observations to date. Dr. Lincoln is being loose with his title in...
They should, because the BB is based on GR. A replacement for GR could alter the BB. Suspected BH, not validated. I cover this in the paper. There's...
This looks like wishful thinking, although I admire your optimism. No, not all papers or authors can be considered even once. That's fine. There are...
Because a paper won't necessarily be read by any professional scientist, regardless of its content. Journals don't have the resources to read every...
What is your evidence of this? Do you think ideas are considered by a reputable publisher regardless of the author's credentials? I made it easy to...
Concur! That's why I made this post in the Alternative Theories section:...
https://vixra.org/pdf/2006.0231v1.pdf Abstract: It’s shown that black holes contradict laws of special relativity in some local inertial frames,...
Separate names with a comma.
