I am saying that orbital electrons are not part of an atom; in my humble opinion, they are simply an unfortunate historical aberration stemming from...
How about discussing the existence of positive holes; those quasi-particles considered to be positive charge carriers when in reality they are fixed...
Have been out of the Sciforums loop since Easter. In that time all 3 STEM Development papers have been updated with adjustments made to many figures....
'without peer review'. It would be great to have a couple of peer reviews. Peer reviews are most difficult to organise without paying thousands of...
The purpose of this post was to draw attention to the STEM model that claims to explain 'what we observe better than existing models'. So how well...
From one dick to another, how quick you judge with so little information. I would suggest that you have not read the original reference to the STEM...
The statement 'γ-ray emission is attributed to a nucleus dropping to a lower energy state from an excited state etc.' in no way leads to or supports...
The provided Wikipedia reference states 'There are however problems with the shell model when an attempt is made to account for nuclear properties...
I have never seen references supporting this concept. Can you provide them?
STEM is an energy-centric approach. It is based upon the hypothesis there is only one type of energy, with electric and magnetic fields considered to...
I find the abstract assertion that 'The db itself has no dimensions (no length, no width and no height)' to be untenable; and time in Spacetime seems...
STEM could be another curved ball, although without the prestige of Einstein. I hope you check out some of the detail.
Conventional Science represents the nucleus as being unstructured: just a random grouping of spherical protons and neutrons. What are the...
Separate names with a comma.
