Next aggressive and senseless posts appeared; it seems that is a last “scientific” argument of the SRT defenders. But these defenders are some...
It turn out to be that there are a number of papers were so called “Euclidian relativity” is developing (60-th – 2000 years), where a number of ideas...
- Only [logically] independent events can be simultaneous. In principle, though – that must be some very special situation and in whole Set...
Here isn’t a problem – you compare two different things. The Time/time is universal absolute rule/ possibility that governs over whole Set’s...
Here aren’t problems. Since in reality there isn’t anything besides the absolutely fundamental Set “Information”; all/ everything is/ are some...
Regrettably I’m forced here (see, e.g., SSDS post of 7 June 2011 - 09:57 AM in the thread...
Now a next little upgrade of the informational model in physics appeared, see http://arxiv.org/abs/0707.4657 , v3, (“The Informational Conception...
-? Indeed, none of the links in SSDS posts above were accepted by “mainstream” journals. Including – paper "Space and Time"...
Again the thread about the "twin paradox appears" -? 100 years discussion… The answer is evident: there is no paradox, the "paradox" is in reality...
There is a next (in a huge number of others) attempt to understand – what is the time? And again the result is without something understandable....
That is blank, sorry
Such a topic is rather popular in scientific forums, though the answer is simple – to divide something by zero (including, of course, 0/0) is...
100 years and 23 pages in this thread – and all about a problem that doesn’t exist. Poor twin… Again – so called "twin paradox" isn’t a paradox,...
It seems that 100 years discussion again renewed here – when all, rather probably, is evident – the paradox is in reality a manifestation of inherent...
So it seems that "crackpot papers" isn’t a compliment. What’s pity. Besides - to the link (scienceforums.net) in SSDS post 11-24-11, 05:29 AM an...
And - continue: Sorry - what does that mean? Cheers
Since there aren't objections from Tach relating to SSDS post above - let think that "crackpot papers" was indeed a compliment. So - continue:...
- "crackpot papers" - That is a swear-word or a compliment? If a compliment - then thanks! Cheers
To simplify the twin paradox? – That is very simple. It’s enough to suggest the existance of the absolute spacetime and an absolute reference frame...
Regrettably I cannot to point out the arXiv links. So that can be found by, e.g., Google to get the answer: - "Space and Time - arxiv" and...
Separate names with a comma.