You've been caught lying. The "government" does not "admit" that Oswald could not have acted alone. It has been proved beyond reasonable doubt that...
The jihadist attacks were a conspiracy in the same sense that the invasion at Normandy was a conspiracy. The jihadists declared war on the U.S. in...
Gee, it kind of makes you wonder why his associates are all frauds and his department rebuked him for failure to maintain professional standards. Do...
Yawn. You will prance around your obvious agenda until pinned down. Let's see: you pretend that you discovered through magic that the cause of the...
Mackey invited people to comment on his lecture. We provided his address. To date, he's received compliments from rationalists, and nothing but...
You are aware that real engineers and physicists don't consider the collapse of the towers a mystery. It is a problem for you because you are...
You're not addressing my point. Anyone can round up a slew of "academics" to oppose, well, anything that portrays America in a favorable light. In...
Ah, you bring us back to the question I keep asking and you keep running away from. Try to do better this time. There are countries in the world...
Most of us have figured out that you don't know what you're talking about. Explain what you mean by the "distribution" of the steel. Obviously,...
Well, we know with certainty that Kevin Ryan is a lying fraud. Jones keeps insinuating that this paper was peer-reviewed. He is lying. Hope that...
You are--obviously. We've established that beyond dispute.
No "high tech nanothermite" was discovered in WTC dust. You are either lying, deluded, or both.
Have you ever figured out what you intend to do with the "information" you pretend to seek? The real engineers, from whom you are incapable of...
Funny, I don't think everybody is dumb. Some people are smarter than I am. You, on the other hand, are quite dumb. Can we ASSume that it never...
Why are people going on and on about a worthless paper that Jones and other frauds paid to have printed in a vanity journal?
Somehow, your assuring us that you have not so much as glanced at either of the reports I mentioned should lead us to conclude that you are familiar...
I assume that the people here fall into the usual two categories: rationalists and twoofers. Twoofers are ineducable know-nothings, for most part...
You've been caught lying again. Nobody believes that Mackey can't get his fellow scientists to appear on screen with him. There is no reason for him...
A guy who pretends that we don't have some imaginary "distribution" of the steel, after NIST published 10,000 pages NONE of which he bothered to...
So, you think that a real scientist could be found who would publicly disagree with Mackey? What would he say? C'mon, don't be shy. Point out those...
Separate names with a comma.
