Search results

For a second I thought you'd rented A Boy and his Dog for your daughter. That was funny, but scary. It's a great movie but yeah, not for your kids.:D

At about 50 dollars a bottle and 7 a pack, I'd be perfectly happy to pm you my address.

But so much more delicious.

Absinthe and cloves? What, you're trying to take out goth kids?

Well, if they really loved their kids, they wouldn't serve them Jack in the Box.

This amused the hell out of me.

Ah. In either case he's likely not going to provide for the child, which will likely be put in protective care.

Except she wasn't in a group home with other disabled people, she was in a house being abused by people who took advantage of her condition. How could a woman that gone consent to anything? Just, eww.

Rotting in pain somewhere, hopefully. The article doesn't say anything about him.

All I can say.

Oh, and I'm seriously confused by the implication that women, especially sex workers, had some sort of status in Roman and Greek society.

Patriarchy didn't exist until about 1500 years ago. Before then, we all frolicked in the woods singing songs and having mutually respectful sex with each other.

With awful, grandiose tomes that could have been edited to include only the relevent content: "I once skimmed through some Nietzsche, I have horrible self-esteem issues, I like money and I want hunky dudes to rape me." The rest is repetition upon those themes. I suggest cutting eye-holes...

If all did "as they please, when they please, how they please" they would inevitably come into conflict with the desires of others to do the same. Thus we are led back to the need for personal liberty.

I'll bite: How are the two incompatible? A society that is not based on a rational, encompassing view of personal liberty would easily degenerate into anarchy, tyranny or mob rule. History bears this out. Therefore, respect for personal liberty is not more valuable than "a society" but...

I'm sure this topic, being so rationally constructed, will lead to an informative and respectful debate.

It'd be a public relations disaster, but when you think about it, it's not such a bad idea. If you stipulate that Planned Parenthood provides a useful service for economically disadvantaged Blacks (and unless you are hardcore "pro-life" I think you can easily stipulate that) it's poetic justice...

Would it be so terrible if they did? My bias being that easily available birth control and STI services are a good thing, would it be wrong to take money from a group that had a unpleasant ideology to do something beneficial? I mean, if the Klan decided to fund research into an HIV vaccine...

Not a problem. If you're willing to take a bit of risk, you can also drive to Canada and simply buy codeine. Like I said, last time I bought it was ten years back and it was only available at one pharmacy. Good luck! I'm allergic to salicylates and suffer from migraines, so I feel for anyone...