Don't you still get it clown?? I have no POV this time. Learn to organize and aim your vitriol first, lest be called a clown.
LOL. How can I be incorrect when I haven't asserted anything? Got some screws loose pal?
Hahaha. What a clown. LMAO :D:D Thanks for the laughs anyway.
Why should I answer you? lolwut. Where did I say he stole them,you clown ? And whats this about frames? Are you getting confused between Uno Hoo's...
State yourself clearly if you want a clear response. The fault entirely lies with you here. Why should I present counter arguments? Am I the thread...
Hmmm... I heard SR fails with acceleration. To handle it you have to use GR as well. Is this true? As for ignoring you, you didn't make clear you...
But Einstein did not reference Lorentz in his 1905 paper if I remember correctly. His 1905 paper contained no footnotes or references or so I've...
Not that I know of. most are perfectly happy with the magic of relativity. As for the no of hours, they don't deserve any explanations if they can't...
Hahaha. I'm hardly as guilty as mainstream or you perhaps who believes in some dogma without knowing the exact mechanism behind it. I actually have...
Oh really? Then perhaps you should give me the exact mechanism for time dilation and we'll see how many marks you score. And no I'm not talking about...
Neither occurs. Cesium atoms somehow oscillate slower at higher energies leading to clock retardation. Dunno what your implying. I have not yet been...
What? Maybe you still don't understand what I'm saying. I'm saying no time of any kind ever dilates no matter the frame. And what about mass...
I think you misunderstood me. Perhaps you'll understand when I state myself this way. OK so SRT says time dilates with velocity. I say no, at higher...
I'm sorry but I couldn't disagree more, my space and time are absolute and invariant. In my view time doesn't dilate only clocks retard. Space does...
Yes, now you got my point. Obviously a c+v wave will travel more distance in less time than a c wave. This should be detectable. Remember its just a...
I'm merely considering ideal apparatus for the experiment. The perfect vacuum is the one which is free of straggler atoms and all objects of mass...
That is the whole point of all this. Even if a c+v exists we don't know. The test is obviously an object traveling at v emits a wave of light in...
I don't get your point. I'm merely stating that a c+v for a photon has never been tested in a perfect vacuum.
No, I think that all spacetime nonsense is crap. The cause of relativistic effects according to me lies in matter not in spacetime. Obviously I can't...
And I have yet to see someone explain the actual mechanism behind the alleged relativistic effects. Clocks running slower only implies clock...
Separate names with a comma.
