You did not refute anything in the twins thread or you would post the refutation. As to your claim there is only one point in the rest frame with...
Here is a theory. x + 2 = y. x = y. Is this theory consistent? No. So, I only entertain theories that are consistent. I see you are...
Prove time dilation in a model where the speed of light is c in all directions only in an absolute rest frame. You just assume it. Prove it is...
In this hypothetical universe, if you measure the speed of a light beam using clocks and rulers at rest in the aether, you'll measure c. This...
did you miss this??? do you read???? do you need help understanding the facts???? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_dilation This provides...
Well, I provided a proof on how to sync clocks in this model. I am surprised you missed it with your "opinions". So, you are now left to refute...
This is not proof of a particle. It is proof of a behavior.
No it did not. It is simply inconsistent wtih an absolute fixed light speed model. In other words, it is a comic book model. I guess you are...
Is this what you mean? \frac{(x - vr/c)^2}{r^2\gamma^2} + \frac{y^2}{r^2} + \frac{z^2}{r^2} = 1 Every point on this object when mapped with...
This is not a necessary condition. Light moves around atoms, the Brownian motion. It knocks off electons, the photo electic effect. It...
Yes, yes. Is it possible that light operates on matter discreetly? This would make it appear as a particle when in fact it is only a wave....
How did you do with the twins thread? You failed. Otherwise, show everyone here how you can refute my math.
This is true. However, there exists an infinite number of times in the rest frame such that t'=r/c and x' = r. I would hope you know this.
Perhaps you can teach me. How are you going to make time dilation consistent with your model? You cannot just will it. We are conducting...
[EDIT] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_dilation This provides the math for the reasoning of time dilation. Now, this is completely stupid...
You claimed the midpoint is a known fixed point in space. That is how you draw your conclusions. Your argument is therefore circular.
First, you need to understand your model. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KHjpBjgIMVk Time dilation of a consequence of two light emission...
First, you must understand how we arrive at time dilation. Do you understand why? It is because we accept multiple light emission points in the...
This implies you can prove candidates for dark matter. You see, there are observable issues not decided by GR. So, we need dark matter or a new...
May I ask why you think light is a particle?
Separate names with a comma.
