There is nothing to "sabotage" , remember, the word salads are being served (by you) in Alternative Theories, PseudoScience, etc. Get real. I would...
Why? That I frequent the website for my personal entertainment? What is wrong with that? I find your posts almost as entertaining as chinglu's and...
You are conversing with a professional troll (river). On a serious basis, Kerr-Newmann and Reissner-Nordstrom are theoretical models of a type of...
I really don't care what you think , I am simply using this website for entertainment. You realize that you have been relegated to Alternative...
Yes, this is basic calculus. It has nothing to do with either my criticism of someguy1's ability to solve the basic geometry problem of trisecting...
The way you phrased it was interpreted by arfa as a correction. The net effect is he changed a right statement into a wrong statement under your...
Actually, "to the right" is correct. ...while "to the left" is incorrect. So, your correction to arfa's post and his change of statement are both...
See, it wasn't that difficult to get it right again.
This is not what the thread is about, the thread is about , as the title says it, 0.(9) being equal to 1. The "dispute" is a side show, arfa brane...
Try explaining it to someguy1. He is still struggling with the solution. Actually, you are lying, I explained it in great detail to someguy1, for...
I understand it, I even gave you the definition many posts ago. But this is not what we are talking about, we are talking about your inability to...
Yes, he is. No, he isn't. When he's proven wrong he starts getting obscene. Means he ran out of arguments and denials.
So, you did not post this: ? How did you calculate 0.00999 ? What happens if you multiply again by 10^{-2}? I asked you before and you pretended...
Good for you. True, but this is not what is being debated. True, but this is not what is being debated. Also true but this is not the subject...
OK, let's try again, what does your point (the convention on the number of significant digits) have to do with the way division by powers of ten is...
No, I am simply cutting off your repeated diversions and pointing you back to the post where you made your statements that started the whole debate:...
Yes, it agrees with what you said. Your point is, again?
Yet, we are talking about the case where you DO divide 0.9999 (by powers of 10) Sure but this is NOT the case we are discussing. You need to stop...
The whole post is a failure, a word salad.
This Source disagrees with your answer, (and with the other two sources you are citing), according to it, the number of significant digits is 4, not...
Separate names with a comma.
