Religion, Dinosaurs, A.I. and Aliens

In addition when someone directly contradicts their own example in a feeble effort to "sustain" their false claim that would also constitute trolling.
In other words you're so wedded to your false view that you'll make up any old shit trying to support it.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

When someone contradicts, disagrees with, and demands proof for every word every poster states despite repeated links provided for evidence, definitions and irrefutable firsthand testimonies...that would be considered trolling too.

It's beyond trolling. It's harassment of Sciforums members.
Of course he's not bothering me. My facts speak for themselves.
I just feel concern for other members I see him constantly follow around like the plague.
Shouldn't there be some regulation against this kind of behavior?

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Me or Dwdder? I dont think either of us are harassing. If you think i am then i will go back and deltes some of my posts.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

When someone makes assertions that they cannot or will not substantiate that, by the forum rules, is trolling.
When someone makes accusations of "fabrication" and "misquoting" that they cannot (or will not) substantiate that, too, is against forum rules.

And claiming your assertions to be facts when in actuality they aren't is also trolling.

Read the forum rules.

 

:bawl:I left the name out for a reason.
It's like throwing a rock into a pack of dogs.
The one that yelps...is the one that got hit!
Don't worry John, He's yelping. :bawl:

Guilty. Judged by his own hand.

 

So you DO mean John then. Since it was he who "yelped" first.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

Or is this yet more evidence of your selective "thinking"?

 

It was the sound of the yelp that gave it away.
His was more of a whimper, but yours had a real growl to it.

 

.

well, in my relegion, meeting aliens(wich it would be a war when all humans unite, but just for that war) so meeting aliens, is going to happen one day, and we do beleive that the univerce is crowling with living planets, and earth is differently that the center of the univerce, and besides aliens(unknown, we don't know how they are), and the djin, who are another race more advanced than us, and djins, are not as some people think like in animes or fiction films, not genes, and not genes in a pot, and not a wish genes or whatever, they are other intelligent race, like us humans.
that's what my relegion says about that.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

hehehehe
and that's not a trolling from my imagination

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Actually this is a repost from page 5, #95 of this thread.
I did attempt to cover this in depth.
Do you have something new you'd like to add?

 

.

sorry, i forgot,i don't know, maybe another time, but i answered the opic question in islam view.
and apperently it's useless to have such a good direct answer((i think)), anyway...

 

James, in the first example forever would be correct. It is their knowledge and intellect that made one persons response correct and one incorrect.

The second example (the seeds) was not to say that seed would grow into a tree but that it would grow into something. You see, you are injecting your own knowledge into these scenarios when it is not warranted or accurate to do so. It is interesting that someone would get that impression when it was not even implied. That in and of itself is some type of Rorschach test.

 

I think i may be confusing 'theory and hypothesis' though...may be. As i was sitting here it occurred to me the phrase 'music theory'. To me the term theory seems a bit misplaced but the phrase itself is something we are inclined to accept.

Suppose a person has in front of them a few dozen parts to complete an engine. Now they are stuck on how to complete a step in the completion of this engine (motor). One person claims 'i have a theory'. He visualized the way to proceed, which was\is a fairly intricate process (proceeding with the build is).

Is his claim of 'i have a theory' accurate?

 

No:

Your confusion would be considerably reduced if you actually read posts and links addressed to you.
http://www.sciforums.com/showpost.php?p=2578479&postcount=314
http://www.sciforums.com/showpost.php?p=2578489&postcount=318

 

I will give my answer to the last question.

Is his claim of 'i have a theory' accurate?

Answer: Yes.

 

John, why do you persistently fail to read what is given to you?
Why do persistently fail to support your contentions?
Either back up your claim that it is is correct, with links and/ or quotes (your own "reasoning" is insufficient"), or you will be banned for 3 days.

 

Then you are contradicting yourself.

 

*** NOTE FROM A MOD ***
John99 has received a 3 day ban for persistent trolling, refusal to support his arguments and refusal or inability to read posts addressed to him.