How many of you would pay some extra money to use an airline that has a strict no-Muslim / no-Arab policy? this would clearly be a "racist" company, but how many of you would use its service anyway? i suspect even the hardcore lefties might agree to this i know i would feel much safer if i knew there were no such people on board. this is not because i hate all Muslims / Arabs, it is because some of them blow up airplanes. i just don't want to be blown up and will gladly pay a premium for the extra security and peace of mind. how about you?
actually I might pay extra for an airline that shipped us naked and flew our luggage on a seperate flight. Not only that but they put you under anesthetic after you're seated and for the duration.
what if, this company had that policy, and also, because of that policy, they had really relaxed security checks etc? like you could just have your bag x-ray'd while you walk through a metal detector? so how would you implement the screening?
I want an airline that has no white people in it. Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! - N
How about an airline just for me, every person on earth has an individual aircraft Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! Now that would be awesome, but no chance of happening
Like i said, no chance of happening, a stupid comment Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! However, I hope to fly them when i retire from the Airforce! So i guess i'll have to wait until then, Either the A380, or 747-400 (or later model).
I think its a great idea, it would save billions of dollars in airport security worldwide, because no one really cares when they blow eachother up, its only when they blow us up we get annoyed, i mean they blow themselves up in iraq everyday, no one cares anymore. So they can continue there airplane terroism, but strictly on there own airlines, then after a while it will be like iraq, just another statistic everyday 200 killed in iraq bombing today, 200 blew up on muslim plane today, when we are spoon fed this news day in & day out our brains become numb to it.
after september 11, i resigned my contract to do some more marketing for a certain video game company. my first flight was in november. i took a can of creamed corn (the hard metal kind that needs an opener), and a skiing sock. the idea was that if anyone fucked with the plane i was on, they would taste my corny goodness up close...i was once asked by the airport security why i always travelled with a can of creamed corn (i knew the TSA's fairly well, and would frequently hang around the security checkpoint discussing Chicago Blackhawks hockey with the head manager)..i told them why i had the corn stuffed into a skiing sock, and the head TSA told me that he wished there were more people like me, it would make his job a little less stressful. in retrospect, i dont know whether to be flattered, or to be alarmed at how easily the TSA's allowed me onto a flight with an obvious weapon.
Mutiny as passengers refuse to fly until Asians are removed Passengers refuse to allow holiday jet to take off until two Asian men are thrown off plane 12:08pm 20th August 2006 British holidaymakers staged an unprecedented mutiny - refusing to allow their flight to take off until two men they feared were terrorists were forcibly removed. The extraordinary scenes happened after some of the 150 passengers on a Malaga-Manchester flight overheard two men of Asian appearance apparently talking Arabic. Passengers told cabin crew they feared for their safety and demanded police action. Some stormed off the Monarch Airlines Airbus A320 minutes before it was due to leave the Costa del Sol at 3am. Others waiting for Flight ZB 613 in the departure lounge refused to board it. The incident fuels the row over airport security following the arrest of more than 20 people allegedly planning the suicide-bombing of transatlantic jets from the UK to America. It comes amid growing demands for passenger-profiling and selective security checks. It also raised fears that more travellers will take the law into their own hands - effectively conducting their own 'passenger profiles'. The Tories said the Government's failure to reassure travellers had led the Malaga passengers to 'behave irrationally' and 'hand a victory to terrorists'. Websites used by pilots and cabin crew were yesterday reporting further incidents. In one, two British women with young children on another flight from Spain complained about flying with a bearded Muslim even though he had been security-checked twice before boarding. The trouble in Malaga flared last Wednesday as two British citizens in their 20s waited in the departure lounge to board the pre-dawn flight and were heard talking what passengers took to be Arabic. Worries spread after a female passenger said she had heard something that alarmed her. Passengers noticed that, despite the heat, the pair were wearing leather jackets and thick jumpers and were regularly checking their watches. Initially, six passengers refused to board the flight. On board the aircraft, word reached one family. To the astonishment of cabin crew, they stood up and walked off, followed quickly by others. The Monarch pilot - a highly experienced captain - accompanied by armed Civil Guard police and airport security staff, approached the two men and took their passports. Half an hour later, police returned and escorted the two Asian passengers off the jet. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=401419&in_page_id=1770
notice how the jokers didn't answer my question. this idea could become a real possibility. Islamophobia is becoming mainstream. i mean not the PC meaning (hate of Muslim), but the real meaning of the words, which is fear of Muslims. this could be followed by recent legislations and policy shifts in many countries. my argument is that the bleeding heart liberals and the ACLU types will use this airline too. because you may be a "racist" for being scared of Muslims, but you know what is safer for you and your family.
Really? How much "safer"? Airline travel (especially with security the way it is) is still incredibly safe anyway. People tend to underestimate the probability of common events occurring, but overestimate the probability of a rare event. You guys make hijacking/bombing planes sound like a common occurance. I wonder what the probability of being killed in a terrorist attack is? Considering there are several thousand comercial flights a day. I'm probably more likely to get run over by a taxi once I leave the Airport.... Bang
What about an Atheist 'Brown Person'? Would I be able to fly on this Airline? And if I did, what stops me from getting glares and stares from my fellow passengers (apart from them looking at my stylish attire and savy fashion-sense?)
Hey, the only joker is you with your proposal, heh. Wow, the terrorists have won. What a bunch of scaredy cats. The terrorists have won, the terrorists have won, the terrorists have won! At least they've yet to win in my book. Continue to leave in fear from them. As you live in fear from them, not wanting to die, continue to be the chickenhawk that sends your own kid to die instead thinking you'll put an end to terrorism in Iraq. Let other people do the fighting for you. Continue to do things that you think will put an end to all this yet won't. I love the way you scared peons face things. First it was attacking the wrong country for 9/11 when most of the hijackers came from our so-called ally, Saudi Arabia, and now with this latest UK threat, more guys came from Pakistan, another one of our so-called allies. Not even that, but we decide to help out our so-called ally's enemy in a modern-day Iran-Iraq Contra Scandal by helping India with nuclear technology as we continue to preach against nuclear research from Iran. Instead of attacking Saudi Arabia, we attack Iraq. Instead of putting the hurt on Pakistan, we just ban all Muslims. Yeah, no wonder why terrorism won't stop because instead of attacking the root of the problem, we do a complete moronic 180 by either attacking the wrong country or ban all Muslims so we wind up creating more extremists that hate us. Way to go, retards! This isn't about racial issues but rather how absurd the proposal is and how it won't stop terrorist attacks. Do you even realize that 10x as many terrorist attacks have happened on our own lands, and it's been from white people, not Muslims Arabs? Earth Liberation Front blows up and sets fire to many industrial buildings, we have Timothy McVeigh blowing up the Murrah Federal Building, we have wars in Waco, TX, and Ruby Ridge, we have Christian extremeists blowing up abortion clinics, we have mad pipe bombers that blow up the Atlanta Olympics, and we have a whacky religious president killing our kids by sending them to war in the wrong country because God told him to. All sorts of crap. What about them? Where there's a will, there's a way. You cannot stop someone that's willing to give up their life to kill someone. And as Nickelodeon said, occurances such as that are rare, why are you so afraid? What a pussy. What happened to the American and British backbone that we used to all be known for? We're no longer John Wayne's, we're have yellowstreaks on our backs. Oh no, the terrorists, the terrorists, boo-frickin-hoo. Grow some balls and quit trying to stop people from blowing themselves up by blowing things out of proportion. Yes, The Pussification of America, indeed. - N
I notice no comment on my proposal. lol As for what happened after 9/11 and why we attacked where we did. It's easy to understand. We went where we knew the source was. Yes the individuals that hijacked the plane were from Saudi Arabia, but their boss is hiding in Pakistan. Now do we attack a country of innoccents that are not sheltering the boss, or do we roll right over the paid meatshields? Hmmm, tough choice.
