“Singularity universes” my theory of everything I am YouTube taught any review?

Christoph

Registered Member

Whut?

Try again with paragraphs?

This is unparsible. Can you re-post, but this time with paragraphs please.

This is unparsible. Can you re-post, but this time with paragraphs please.
My theoretical facts are relatively unconnected and I kinda just jumbled all my ideas together sorry, but do you have any feedback on the theory or where I can submit it to see if any math lines up?

“A little learning is a dangerous thing; drink deep, or taste not the Pierian spring: there shallow draughts intoxicate the brain, and drinking largely sobers us again.”

“A little learning is a dangerous thing; drink deep, or taste not the Pierian spring: there shallow draughts intoxicate the brain, and drinking largely sobers us again.”
Nice poem but did you like or have any idea on the post?

My theoretical facts are relatively unconnected and I kinda just jumbled all my ideas together sorry, but do you have any feedback on the theory or where I can submit it to see if any math lines up?

Reported as duplicate post.

Not an auspicious start for Christoph.

Our universe completely vast and well defined yet not understood may be a singularity inside a black hole.
And while you are reformatting, please add some explanation how it is possible I am able to walk around my living room if the universe is a singularity. Because, a singularity being a point of infinite density, it's not possible to walk around inside of one.

Edit: Ah, I see this has already been pointed out to you on Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/u_Chris-L-...om_theory_singularity_universes_the_universe/

And while you are reformatting, please add some explanation how it is possible I am able to walk around my living room if the universe is a singularity. Because, a singularity being a point of infinite density, it's not possible to walk around inside of one.

Edit: Ah, I see this has already been pointed out to you on Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/u_Chris-L-...om_theory_singularity_universes_the_universe/
Sorry for English but during the implosion effect the singularity bounces into a point and all the matter and dark matter may exist in such a small point that it acts as a point of extreme density

Christoph:

Regarding the paragraphs, etc.: if you cannot take the time to present your work clearly to readers, why would you expect anybody to waste their time reading it? It is up to you to make your ideas clear and easy to access.

Christoph:

Regarding the paragraphs, etc.: if you cannot take the time to present your work clearly to readers, why would you expect anybody to waste their time reading it? It is up to you to make your ideas clear and easy to access.
Actually James R why haven't YOU quickly realized, just by performing a cursory skim, the OP is incoherent rambling nonsense fit only to be booted to the Cesspool? Not even fit to be called pseudoscience.

Actually James R why haven't YOU quickly realized, just by performing a cursory skim, the OP is incoherent rambling nonsense fit only to be booted to the Cesspool? Not even fit to be called pseudoscience.
Because even a cursory skim is premature, at least until OP does some cursory organizing of his thoughts.

Sorry for English but during the implosion effect the singularity bounces into a point and all the matter and dark matter may exist in such a small point that it acts as a point of extreme density
How can a point bounce into a point? It's already one!
You've failed to address the issue I raised. A point has zero length in all directions, yet my living room has positive length in all directions. Therefore, my living room as-is doesn't fit inside a singularity. Thus, according to your claims, my living room is larger than the universe it's in. That seems a bit contradictory to me?

If everything dies then only gravitons and photons exist in a potentially infinite vacuum which over an infinite amount of time the gravitons which we know can ben light by two ways, gravitational lensing and the event horizon the gravitons can bend enough photons to all impact at the exact point in space
No, that's a violation of the second law of thermodynamics; a heat-dead universe is at maximum entropy, and cannot transition (back) to a state of lower entropy, which what you are describing amounts to.

Because even a cursory skim is premature, at least until OP does some cursory organizing of his thoughts.
My cursory skim suggests you are right: Christoph is making so many separate (and unsupported) claims, a better overview (and explanation, preferable with evidence) of each one would be very beneficial. Just about every other sentence should be a separate thread because it's dealing with another claim about another subject (although I suspect most of those threads would end at post #2 with a variant of "no, that's not how physics works.").

My cursory skim suggests you are right: Christoph is making so many separate (and unsupported) claims,....(although I suspect most of those threads would end at post #2 with a variant of "no, that's not how physics works.").
Way too accommodating. My judgement as to why OP ramblings was not instantly booted to Cesspool; SF hierarchy realize what a sparsely populated desert this site has become. Hence, bend over backwards to retain new members who at least show indications of being regular posters. Quantity over quality. Others here obviously see it differently.

Way too accommodating. My judgement as to why OP ramblings was not instantly booted to Cesspool; SF hierarchy realize what a sparsely populated desert this site has become. Hence, bend over backwards to retain new members who at least show indications of being regular posters. Quantity over quality. Others here obviously see it differently.
You may be right, although in my opinion, new members deserve a chance to correct themselves, even if the initial outlook isn't good. Let the newbies learn what is and isn't appropriate here. It's the long-time members that can't behave themselves that surprises me (I'm not naming names; everybody knows the members I'm talking about).

You may be right, although in my opinion, new members deserve a chance to correct themselves,...
The chances of a radical re-wiring of internal 'logic' circuitry is imo extremely slim in this case. An unbroken wall of text out of the starting block is a good enough indicator for me.
It's the long-time members that can't behave themselves that surprises me (I'm not naming names; everybody knows the members I'm talking about).
Indeed.

You may be right, although in my opinion, new members deserve a chance to correct themselves, even if the initial outlook isn't good. Let the newbies learn what is and isn't appropriate here. It's the long-time members that can't behave themselves that surprises me (I'm not naming names; everybody knows the members I'm talking about).

I've been on these forums for a long while, not that i post all that much how ever, i do read alot here. And yes, i would agree that the site has taken a step towards 'less scientific' post being allowed in the Science sections of the site. how ever, these forums have never been rigdigt around 'non-main-stream-science.' such as physics.com or the likes.

As to the subject of the original post, more or less unreadable with no effort at all to support 'ideas' with what i would consider readable. More intelligent beings' might just read something more than i. But with in my own limitis, im having a hard time grasping that this post after weeks is still not moved to an apropiate forum such as the 'pool'.