18 gay muslims to be stoned to death!!%%?????!!!!

I will ask you once and once only to refrain from accusing me of spreading hatred. It is abundantly clear that the issue of Lal's statistics is far from refuted or decided in either way.

I care about people most acutely when they start to get executed for being what they are. Some people have less concern, perhaps, when others from the same association are the ones doing the executing.

I imagine they had paper; but wasn't the Quran recorded on pieces of bark and leaves? Why one rule for one document and another rule for another?

And the others did, enabled largely through dhimmitude.

Ah! All the fault of the dirty Christians. Of course.

And the rest, then do. Of course this also rears the issue of zina, and the punishment of women for rape, since, as you point out:

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

And this is the last time I will direct you to Lal's "history".

Also this article in the NYT

http://www.hinduonnet.com/fline/fl1514/15141050.htm
http://www.echarcha.com/forum/archive/index.php?t-11895.html

It is people like Lal (and of his party) who were responsible for the wholesale massacre of Muslims in Gujarat.

And people who support his false histories who are responsible for acts like these:

http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?t=70540

I have no patience with such people.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

That's great, but I don't know whether or not his data is wrong or not, and neither do you. The ICHR charges one thing. Lal charges another. He had a long history as a standard historian in India, so I'm not prepared to dismiss his claims out of hand as you seem to be implying.

The rest of your post appears to be an attempt to drag in an attack on an imam. Yet, I don't recall you ever posting your dismay at an attack on say, an Israeli, or a Jewish person. Your outrage is selective.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Like your memory, it would seem.

Anyway, it is good to see how you evaluate data for formulating opinions. I won't impose on you in this matter again.

 

LOL - all right, where have you decried an attack on a Jewish person? Suicide bombing of Israelis? Any terrorist attack? My poor memory fails, you know.

 

Continually, it would seem, making any further discussion moot.

 

It would seem continuous, if only it seemed continuous.

 

Don't worry, I have total recall.

 

yay who cares

its not like a demonstration or a boycott or a die-in will be organized
fuck
it's their culture.

besides, the Zionazis are no better, right? they stone 18 Palestinians a day
and black people used to be lynched in the U.S.

 

Ah. Then your proofs should be easy to find. I leave you to them, wherever they are.

 

Right behind all the ones forthcoming from you, since infinity apparently.

And like I said elsewhere, don't worry, I have your measure now.

I won't bother you in your crusade.

 

Which ones are these you're waiting for again? And, if I supply them, can I have your bona fides then?

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

Which crusade is that? The one against bullshit? Feel free to bother me about it as much as you like, where it concerns you.

 

:yawn: :sleep:<---- level of interest in continuing this discussion

 

LOL - strews accusations, flees scene, ducks responsibility. Byee.

 

Oh dear.. How sad !!..

 

Someone should have mentioned this to Dato' Seri Anwar bin Ibrahim huh?

The simple fact is summed up on the map String posted. Muslim countries are the most intolerable towards homosexuals in the entire world. That's not up for debate - the debate is why? IMHO it seems the common thread is Islam. Maybe I am wrong but I can't see what else links all of these desperate States together? Certainly not culture.

If a Caliphate were initiated how do you think open homosexuals will be death with? When the Caliphate failed and scapegoats needed, I wonder who would be scarified first? The idiot Imams?!?! Hardily.

RE: History
You spent 20+ pages defending Muslim aggression against Persians and specifically defended attacks on polytheist Arabs because they were polytheists. Here I post a direct quote from the Muslim general who ordered the attack on innocent Persians as purely a means of stealing their wealth and you're head pops out for a second and right back into the ground it goes.

Michael