# 2020: Physics Nobel Prize:

Discussion in 'General Science & Technology' started by paddoboy, Oct 6, 2020.

1. ### POVphysics2Registered Member

Messages:
93
You wouldn't recognize physics if you saw it.

3. ### originHeading towards oblivionValued Senior Member

Messages:
11,731
You wouldn't know real physics if it kicked you in the nutz.

How many physics courses have you taken? By the way, not understanding a wiki article does not count as a physics course.

5. ### POVphysics2Registered Member

Messages:
93
Today's physicists trying to unify QM with GR.

7. ### POVphysics2Registered Member

Messages:
93
I mean, the simplification is so easy. You're just too proud to see it.

Last edited: Dec 2, 2020
8. ### POVphysics2Registered Member

Messages:
93
I came to this forum with the best intentions, hoping to talk about physics. I found a lot of crappy people. I didn't find anybody who knew a damn thing about physics. These people claimed I didn't known anything about physics, but they never actually discussed anything with me. The people on this forum are crooked and deceitful. You are dishonest, rude and unfair. It is no surprise that they physics community can't make any meaningful progress. I can only hope that you all won't be around in a hundred years, maybe then some new breakthroughs will occur.

9. ### exchemistValued Senior Member

Messages:
11,841
In post 1 of the thread on the other forum, to which you referred in post 10 of this thread, you wrote this: " The speed of light c shows up in special relativity equations, the Einstein equations, DeBroglie wavelength and the basic wave equation c = lambda*f. "

Which is cobblers: c does not feature in de Broglie's relation. (c= fλ is not a wave equation by the way. A wave equation is a 2nd order partial differential equation. But that's another story.)

Anyway, you have been showing your lack of knowledge of physics from the start, while denying that you have anything to learn and calling others with actual physical science degrees ignorant. That is what pisses people off.

But on one thing I agree with you: a "Grand Trampling Exit", of the type you are now contemplating, would seem to be your best option.

Last edited: Dec 2, 2020
10. ### POVphysics2Registered Member

Messages:
93
I'm surprised you didn't take a print screen shot of it. Given the credibility of people on this forum, I have my doubts that your criticisms are valid.

11. ### POVphysics2Registered Member

Messages:
93
I mean, honestly, I half expect the physics community to break down under it's own lack of accomplishments and unnecessarily complicated (un-insightful) efforts. There are massive holes in all the major theories.

Messages:
11,841

Messages:
93
14. ### POVphysics2Registered Member

Messages:
93
While we're at it, can you explain why we care so much about the entropy of black holes? I mean, is this going to lead to a major breakthrough in technology some day? Like, are you going to invent the entropy drive or something?

15. ### POVphysics2Registered Member

Messages:
93
Can you explain to be how tiny little superstrings form together to create spacetime? I mean, my spaggetti doesn't act that way. Or, why is it that the arrow of time is in the direction of increasing entropy (which makes sense). So the big bang should be the point of minimum entropy. So, how does superstring spagetti get us to a minimum entropy?

16. ### POVphysics2Registered Member

Messages:
93
Why does Quantum Loop gravity sound like chain mail? And how did it get there? And how is it compatible with big bang cosmology? Like I said, all the leading theories are garbage!

17. ### POVphysics2Registered Member

Messages:
93
And have you physicists, you amazingly brilliant geniuses figured out how you're going to prove that you can recover the "information content" of objects dropped into a black hole after it evaporates after 10^10^10^42 years? I mean, the load of total bullshit is amazing! The kind of crap that physicists waste their careers on and get paid by college students and taxpayers. It's the biggest fraud ever!

You jackoffs want to be rude to me when I went out of my way to be nice. What has the physics community accomplished since the GPS system, that has actually helped make people's lives better?

18. ### POVphysics2Registered Member

Messages:
93
Did you ever find evidence for banging branes? No. Did you ever find evidence for the Many World Interpretation? No. Did you ever figure out what reality is? No. Did you ever figure out how chemistry causes consciousness? No. Did you ever figure out why the physics constants are fine tuned for complex chemistry? No. Did you ever figure out what causes the physics constants to exist at all? No.

Messages:
27,534
Wow!!! I mean Wow!!!!!! Someone appears to have gone off the deep end!

20. ### exchemistValued Senior Member

Messages:
11,841
Of course you can. Nobody needs to log on to read the threads on that site.

21. ### Michael 345New year. PRESENT is 72 years oldlValued Senior Member

Messages:
13,029
Only thing missing in this lot, as Billy Connolly asked, does anyone know how did the diced carrots get there? No

exchemist likes this.
22. ### BellsStaff Member

Messages:
24,190
Mod Note

You seriously need a hobby!

You are flaming for a response. You have been infecting threads with this kind of rubbish since you arrived on this site.

It is neither nice or acceptable.

site's rules. Pay particular attention to E4:

E4. Refrain from posting several consecutive posts in a row as this disturbs the readable flow of a thread. If nobody has replied to your first post, edit it instead of posting another post.

And then while you're at it, look at the part on flaming and trolling.

23. ### Write4UValued Senior Member

Messages:
19,199
And that is controversial?
Ever heard of CDT (Causal Dynamical triangulation)?

Causal Dynamical Triangulation
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Causal_dynamical_triangulation