Discussion in 'UFOs, Ghosts and Monsters' started by Magical Realist, Mar 31, 2015.
And these examples are just the very , very , extreme tip of the iceberg, so to speak.
Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.
What? And miss out on all the fun? Not likely...
You don't understand sarcasm do you dear? I know. It's so damn complicated. Maybe you should lie down for awhile.
So this is fun rather than the search of the truth? Interesting.
Hamlet you are not. And this, my friend, was a lie:
Period of what?
Actually it WAS a falsehood and so a lie in my sense. I mistakenly thought Dydderr or whoever he is called posted that. But I'm not going to lose sleep over it. My points have been more than clearly made here.
Okay lets get over this and focus on the OP, shall we.
Thank you. That is a start. All people ask from you is rationality and accountability. Was that so very hard?
Please. You wouldn't know what "truth" was even if it was pointed out to you in
GIANT NEON BOLD CAPS!
And you? Lesser lights and all...
So the insults continue to be more important, than any indepth discuss upon the topic.
Despite what you believe and have been told, this is all ABOUT science. Science as the endless quest for truth. Knowing phenomena like this exist will only help us in framing an understanding of who we are and where we are headed. There is nothing "against science" in these posts of mine. It is only heresy to those who make of science some dogmatic religion where everything is known and settled. It isn't. And that, as we can see in this exchange, is a very unsettling realization to such people. They kind of go crazy when confronted with these topics. Like how fundies start screaming demon and hellfire when you back THEM into a corner too. It's nerve-racking to be uncertain about the ultimate nature of reality, unless you live there everyday like I do.
No... You don't. But that's OK.
No scientist says this...
And yet you not only fail to understand the difference between acceptable and unacceptable evidence, you steadfastly REFUSE to acknowledge the difference.
Exactly rand Exactly....!!!!!!!!!
I just posted 4 compelling examples of evidence regarding ufos. Are you denying that?
Now River has taken to inventing stuff as well.
Do you understand why the scientific community doesn't accept those things as "evidence"?
I'm pretty sure it's been explained to you several dozen times already.
Separate names with a comma.