A physicist explains ghosts in our digital reality

Engineers count.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Engineers' count russ, so your point?

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

What is your point russ?

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Jesus, river, I do sleep!

My point is that I'm an engineer and I've been on three "ghost tours". So now you know of at least one sciencey type who has toured a haunted house (a bunch).

 

And...

Oh by the way what places and prove that you were actually there.

 

Don't bother (although his latest reply "prove it", post #25, should give you some idea of his sincerity - or lack of).
River has, over the years, participated in a number of threads where scientists/ physicists have been listed as as investigating "ghosts" and "haunted houses".
But, conveniently, he manages to forget each time the subject comes up [1].
Regardless of what you say he'll shift goalposts - or even subject - and stick with what he believes.

1 This attitude extends to just about anything where he's challenged: most recently I've had to list authors/ books I've read to show how I don't limit myself to accepted science and have a knowledge of the woo stuff too. On no fewer than 3 separate occasions in the last 6-9 months or so he's denied having been told that and asked again for me to provide a list.

 

Dywyddyr

Don't track this thread with your self absorbed bitterness.

I asked Russ a legitimate question like it or not.

 

No.

 

Ah, assumptions again...

The question may well have been "legitimate" (although unwarranted): but your response (regardless of what Russ posts) won't be.

 

You have never asked a legitimate question. Your questions are agenda laden, and lead to more ignorant type of questions that in general reflect on your own pseudoscientific beliefs and general anti science stance.

 

Put far better than I just did. Totally factual truth...

 

Lets just keep this thread on topic. Shall we.

If you want to start another thread about what ever then do so. If not then , SHUT the****Up.

 

You mean as distinct from you asking your meaninglesss agenda laden questions, to constantly try and discredit science and promote your own ridiculous fairy tale beliefs?
Go take a bath river!

 

It is the questions that evolve science.

 

The question to Russ is warranted.

Notice he said "NO".

 

On your record it was not warranted.
And I also among most reasonable level headed people on this forum, would also have answered NO, to such a well known anti science, pro pseudoscience, Idiot.
I certainly rank Russ's honesty in what he claimed above your own unsupported nonsensical agenda and lies.

 

No was the answer. Rather honest by Russ.

 

No was the answer to your rather trollish, agenda laden question, that you know you would have questioned anyway, if he had of decided to give you the proof your unwarranted question asked for.