A proposal to reduce confusion.

Discussion in 'Conspiracies' started by Gawdzilla Sama, Dec 3, 2017.

  1. sideshowbob Sorry, wrong number. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,245
    Repeating the word "proof" a hundred times doesn't make it proof.
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. Gawdzilla Sama Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,981
    We should not suffer fools gladly. Sorry, Freddy.
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,348
    What makes it not exist in the first place is that you are misusing the word 'proof'.

    Your own definition of 'playing dumb' says 'evidence and logical argument'. Those aren't proof.


    Not to put too fine a point in it but I was not claiming your arguments were complete bunk, nor did I reject the arguments and evidence. I simply corrected your erroneous use of the word 'proof'. They have not been proven. You overstate your case, and shoot yourself in the foot.
     
    Last edited: Dec 12, 2017
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. Gawdzilla Sama Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,981
    It's convenient that conspiracy advocates offer themselves as examples.
     
  8. FatFreddy Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    489
    No objective thinking person who takes the time to look at it will agree with you.
    http://www.sciforums.com/threads/a-proposal-to-reduce-confusion.160313/#post-3491703

    We may have to start talking about details.
     
  9. Daecon Kiwi fruit Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,133
    If we pretend to agree with him, perhaps he'll go away and find new people to convince.
     
  10. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,348
    Demonstrably false, since generally, most objective, thinking people don't subscribe to those conspiracies.
     
  11. Gawdzilla Sama Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,981
    But if you only would LISTEN!

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
    DaveC426913 likes this.
  12. FatFreddy Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    489
  13. origin Trump is the best argument against a democracy. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    10,264
    When you first starting posting I looked a couple and since then I have looked at none. Those couple of post told me all I needed to know about your ability to assess the accuracy of what you link as 'proof'.
     
  14. Gawdzilla Sama Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,981
  15. sideshowbob Sorry, wrong number. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,245
    So says every "true" Scotsman.
     
    DaveC426913 likes this.
  16. Gawdzilla Sama Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,981
    "No objectional quasi-thinking person who fakes having looked at it will agree with anything other than what they already believe.."
     
  17. FatFreddy Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    489
  18. Gawdzilla Sama Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,981
  19. FatFreddy Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    489
    Ok. Address it here.
     
  20. Gawdzilla Sama Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,981
    Why? Your confabulations have rendered you oblivious to reason.
     
  21. sideshowbob Sorry, wrong number. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,245
    You didn't make any point over there. All you did was point to a video. Don't assume that a video that convinced you is going to convince everybody else.

    That's the problem with conspiracy advocates. Half the time, I don't think they even understand their own claptrap. They're just parroting catch-phrases.

    If you really understand your "theories", you should be able to express them in your own words and not expect a video to do it for you.
     
  22. FatFreddy Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    489
    Translation:
    What's shown in that video is such clear proof that the government planned and carried out the 9/11 attack that if I try to obfuscate it, I'll just look silly.

    Evidence is evidence. Who presents it is irrelevant. Please address the argument.
     
  23. Gawdzilla Sama Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,981
    You have an appalling lack of judgment, so bad that you can't declare anything "proof".
     

Share This Page